User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2010/06

Deletion review for Mikie Da Poet edit

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Mikie Da Poet. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Politowski55 (talk) 05:36, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010 edit

Velayudham (reply) edit

Yes, I did before but later the film had progressed significantly so I decided that it can be kept. The AFD tag was removed so I also thought the decision was to keep it. Is there any way you could bring it back? Eelam StyleZ (talk) 13:11, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

FYI edit

At Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Chicago skyline at sunrise, you expressed an opinion on the current nomination at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Chicago skyline image replacement--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:43, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Deleted edit

Finally Death and Adjustment Hypotheses article at wiki got deleted. I am not surprised, but the reason for the deletion as it was deleted previously seemed less useful as things evolve, change. Anyway, Just wanted to let you know as I informed you while I created it.Shoovrow (talk) 17:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

 
Thank you!

King of Hearts - Thank for your participation and support in my RfA.

I can honestly say that your comments and your trust in me are greatly appreciated.

Please let me know if you ever have any suggestions for me as an editor, or comments based on my admin actions.

Thank you!  7  22:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

(Untitled) edit

Hi, I still believe an article of mine was wrongfully deleted. I followed all of the steps and I wanted to let you know that I am open to answering any questions you may have. The page that was deleted was titled "Mikie Da Poet". As seen here, I have created a new userspace and added facts and supporting references to back up all the information that was considered false at one time. Here's the link to it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Politowski55/Mikie_Da_Poet Politowski55 (talk) 05:43, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately, you still have not provided sources establishing enough notability. Facebook is not considered a reliable source. iTunes and Yahoo! Music are mere listings, which constitute trivial coverage. Fox News is a reliable source, but do you have more sources to show this isn't just a special interest story? -- King of ♠ 06:33, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010 edit

Happy Birthday King of Hearts edit

  Hey, King of Hearts. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
-- Vatsan34 (talk) 15:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
Thanks! -- King of ♠ 21:31, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Deletion review for Paint Crew edit

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Paint Crew. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Stifle (talk) 12:54, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massoud Derhally edit

Hi, I see you closed the above deletion discussion as no consensus. While there was not a lot of debate the only people that actually posted were for delete - so why the no consensus? noq (talk) 00:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) My guess is that while the only !voter bolded "weak delete", the text of the comment showed that she really wasn't sure and one !vote is hardly a consensus. I'll let "king of" elaborate further. One thing is certain. That article is in serious need of a visit from the "source fairy". --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 12 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Two !votes are not enough for consensus; this is one of the few times where the result is based on the vote count. Unless there are arguments presented that make the article an extremely obvious candidate for deletion, the result is no consensus. However, feel free to renominate it, as the result was due to a lack of participation. -- King of ♠ 02:56, 12 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Note edit

A file which you previously commented on has been nominated for deletion [1]╟─TreasuryTagsecretariat─╢ 08:21, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Volleyball players edit

I have seen that you edited some volleyball articles. Some players articles, most of them looks outdated. I would like to improve players by country. Could you please choose a country to contribute with? Please take a look on Yekaterina Gamova, Hélia Souza, Serena Ortolani and Kenia Carcaces for a model to follow. Please can you please improve some volleyball players with infobox and some addons? References are very important. Let me know. Oscar987 22:43, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't really follow volleyball. What you probably saw as me "editing" volleyball articles was actually me closing Articles for deletion debates on those topics. -- King of ♠ 01:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

can i see the contents of an article you deleted? edit

hi, can i see the contents of an article you deleted? the article is called "McDojo" ... is there any way I can see its contents as there was some credible & very verifyable content in it which I think can be resurrected in moderation by someone like myself who knows a lot about the subject... please drop a msg on my user talk page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by BWDP (talkcontribs) 11:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The contents are available at User:BWDP/McDojo. -- King of ♠ 20:25, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010 edit

Deletion review for Laura Massey edit

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Laura Massey. Laura Massey is now noteworthy by vast third party sources after presenting a major keynote for Microsoft at the Electronic Entertainment Expo (e3) 2010 in Los Angels this week, she unveiled a revolutionary hands free video chat addon for the Xbox 360 called Kinect. --Bawitdaba1337 (talk) 01:51, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010 edit

Terese Nielsen edit

Hello,

I am letting you know that Terese Nielsen has been nominated for deletion again, as part of a series of AFDs based on the deletion nomination of List of Magic: The Gathering artists, as you participated in the previous AFD for Terese Nielsen. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 19:37, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


Indianapolis Men and Women's Work Release Program edit

I noticed that you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indianapolis Men and Women's Work Release Program as "no consensus". Do you think that it would be a violation of WP:CANVASS to mentioned to all of the other editors there that Indianapolis Men and Women's Work Release Program is up again at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indianapolis Men and Women's Work Release Program (2nd nomination)? Thanks! Location (talk) 04:08, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

No, that is fine, and in fact done quite often. -- King of ♠ 00:19, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#Notifying interested people for more info. -- King of ♠ 00:21, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks again for clarifying. Cheers! Location (talk) 05:01, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010 edit