King Ayan Das

Welcome, King Ayan Das!

Have a plate of cookies!

Welcome to Wikipedia, King Ayan Das! I'm Ozzie10aaaa, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia!

October 2023

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Kareena Kapoor Khan filmography, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

• If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
• If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
• If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Hello, I'm ZLEA. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, HAL Tejas, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ZLEA _T\^C 19:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: HLFT-42 has been accepted

HLFT-42, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

F.Alexsandr (talk) 18:38, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

HAL HLFT-42

I noticed that you added HAL HLFT-42 to the See also sections of many fighter aircraft articles. Since the HLFT-42 is primarily a trainer/LCA, it should be added to the See also sections of aircraft of similar roles. I've reverted many of your additions, but I have left the additions to trainer/LCA articles. - ZLEA _T\^C 05:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

HAL HLFT-42 is comparable to light-weight two-seater fighter jets, such as the KAI FA-50 or the two-seater variant of HAL Tejas. The manufacturer claims that it will have advanced avionics and an EW suite, essential features for a fighter jet. Therefore, I kindly request you to refrain from reverting many of my additions, especially in the 'see also' sections of articles related to light and medium-weight fighter jets King Ayan Das (talk) 05:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

I think you misunderstood what I meant. The See also section is generally for aircraft with a similar primary role. Aircraft such as the F-16 and Tejas are primarily fighters, and while they do have two-seat variants, that does not make them similar to the HLFT-42. Most fighters have two-seat variants, so using that to judge similarity would make for very cluttered See also sections. - ZLEA _T\^C 09:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

If you disagree, feel free to start a discussion about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation. - ZLEA _T\^C 09:43, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Ayan Das 5325

Are you User:Ayan Das 5325? There's nothing wrong with having multiple accounts, so long as they are used for legitimate purposes, but it is recommended that users with multiple accounts disclose that they are the same person to avoid any confusion. - ZLEA _T\^C 22:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Really good job on HAL HLFT-42 :)

Sohom (talk) 18:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to HAL HF-73, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Echo1Charlie (talk) 14:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Misrepresentation of sources in HAL HPT-32 Deepak

In [edit] you claimed that this source says that the HAL HPT-32 Deepak is a development of the HAL HT-2, which it doesn't and is clearly nonsense - what the source actually says is it was developed as a replacement for the HT-2, which is something completely different. In addition you claim that the source says that 144 HPT-32s were built, which it doesn't and that production continued until 1993, which the source doesn't say. It is entirely unacceptable to misrepresent the content of sources like this. Do not do this again.Nigel Ish (talk) 16:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

List of active Indian military aircraft

Please don’t add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source, as you have done on the List of active Indian military aircraft article. Also do NOT insert flagcons into the tables MOS:FLAGCRUFT -Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources –Thank you FOX 52 ^talk! 05:44, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

In related Wikipedia pages like List of active Pakistan Air Force aircraft, List of active Russian military aircraft, flag icons are also inserted. I add them to enhance the visual appearance of this article. Please don't revert all edits instantly. Which edits did I make in this article that were also made in related articles, but there were no reversions of these edits? King Ayan Das (talk) 06:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Just because you found in one article doesn't mean is supersedes the statute, those some that haven't been fixed - FOX 52 ^talk! 06:50, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

DO NOT engaged in an disruptive editing as you are doing on List of active Indian military aircraft article. You are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid conflicts. You must adhere to the regulations as required by the Wikipedia community, If you continue engage in this behavior you will be blocked from editing. FOX 52 ^talk! 07:00, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Okay, I understand that inserting flag icons into the tables violates Wikipedia guidelines. King Ayan Das (talk) 07:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

@King Ayan Das: Again you're creating more problems - "breaks" create issues for smaller screen, and additionally moving things around are not really an improvement- if you have number change(s) or additional aircraft that's fine - FOX 52 ^talk! 23:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Vanamonde93 (talk) 10:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)