The article I am review is the wikipedia article on Bureaucrats.
The lead section summarizes what a bureaucrats means and what kind of job they may hold. It is fairly broad and does not go into much detail as far as explaining what a bureaucrat can do and who can be a bureaucrat.
The articles structure is clear and the use of headings and subheadings is evident. There are no images or diagrams but it is not necessarily needed.
The coverage of the article is lacking of depth. The introduction is rather short with the history of bureaucracy being long but no talk of present day bureaucracy and how it fits into our system of government in the present.
The language seems fitting although another revision would not hurt.
The article does not seem to contain unsourced items.
The references were fairly reliable but once again, with there not being much information there is not much to reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cje25 (talk • contribs) 04:47, 30 November 2014 (UTC)