User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz/Archive 40
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | → | Archive 45 |
Hey gorgeous!
I'm working on (someone else's) little project at the moment, just because it kinda appeals to me. It's getting a real-newbie-type basic introduction to the why's and how's of a few WikiPolicies across, in (hopefully) the shortest terms that the reasons and absolute basics can be got across, in a format which can't be readily misunderstood or misconstrued by anyone at all. It doesn't aim to cover the entire policies in all the detail, but links to them as a "read more" kinda thing. Could you take a look over here and give me some feedback, when you have a spare moment? Pesky (talk) 02:51, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Pesky!
- I've been sorry for not helping you with the horse article, and I also need to help mentor a Berkeley cooperator. I'm behind on my keeping my pledges.
- The page looks very good. My comment would be that we should avoid "cutesy names" as examples. They sound "very American", and are not easy for non-native-English speakers to understand. Also, the tone should appeal to encyclopedia writers, who should be adult-level readers and writers, and that page sounds a bit too sing-song. But I like the spirit of it all and most of the implementation. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 17:29, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
COI+ certification proposal
I've thought of an idea that might break our current logjam with paid editing. I'd love your sincere feedback and opinion.
Feel free to circulate this to anyone you think should know about it, but please recognize that it hasn't agreed upon by either PR organizations or WikiProjects or the wider community. It's also just a draft, so any/many changes can still be made.
Thanks and cheers,
EdwardsBot (talk) 15:01, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- A policy should be crafted. One wishes that the medieval aristocratic abhorrence of commerce shall be replaced by the enlightenment respect for placing the passions under the control of the interests. Input from professional associations of public relations associations is indeed well solicited. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 05:48, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
Hey Kiefer whats up for me it is going very WELL Respond on my page THANKS meeting you Kelenna (talk) 23:28, 29 July 2012 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 30 July 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedians and London 2012; WMF budget – staffing, engineering, editor retention effort, and the global South; Telegraph's cheap shot at WP
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Horse Racing
- Featured content: One of a kind
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
The Signpost: 06 August 2012
- News and notes: FDC portal launched
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
- Featured content: Casliber's words take root
- Technology report: Wikidata nears first deployment but wikis go down in fibre cut calamity
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Martial Arts
Age template
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Again Kiefer seems to be over-compensating about the young 'uns.
|
---|
Hi Kiefer. I was wondering if you could draft a template that could be substituted to leave a message to younger editors who choose to display their age on their user page that informs them of reasons not to use it/directs them to Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors (which sadly says nothing about displaying your age). I want to make sure it isn't something that scares them, but it should have enough information so that the decision they make is informed. Ryan Vesey 20:37, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
|
My RfA
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Extended content
|
---|
Thank you for participating in my RfA, I really appreciate it. Oh, and for the record, I've seen you around quite a bit in recent times. You sure have come a long way over the past several months. Keep up the good work. =) Master&Expert (Talk) 00:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC) Polysemy
|
Credo Reference
I'm sorry to report that there were not enough accounts available for you to have one. I have you on our list though and if more become available we will notify you promptly.
We're continually working to bring resources like Credo to Wikipedia editors, and this will very hopefully not be your last opportunity to sign up for one. If you haven't already, please check out WP:HighBeam and WP:Questia, where accounts are still available. Cheers, Ocaasi 19:14, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Picking names from the end of the alphabet does not constitute a random sample, btw. It may have been haphazard and free from conscious foreseen bias, but usually a random sample would be preferable.
- What conclusions can be drawn from a trial without randomization? That persons with later names are chosen first?
- For a justified conclusion that Credo accounts are likely to improve articles or increase retention of writers, randomization has been recommended since the 1870s. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 11:49, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 12:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Jason Quinn (talk) 12:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply, and explanation. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 20:48, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 August 2012
- News and notes: Tough journey for new travel guide
- Technology report: Just how bad is the code review backlog?
- Featured content: Wikipedia rivals The New Yorker: Mark Arsten
- WikiProject report: From sonic screwdrivers to jelly babies: Doctor Who
Looked for, he cannot be seen.
Listened for, he cannot be heard.
Touched, he cannot be felt."
Hi Kiefer. Any reason you don't have email communications enabled? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- I have tried to reduce my WP involvement to spend more time with my family, and sometimes to play guitar. Reducing email contact is part of that decision. I had thought that you had my email address in real life. I shall send it to you. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 19:46, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Chance
Id guess that like Colonel Smith you dont subscribe to the theory of random chance, and perhaps lean towards viewing coincidences as elements of the great plan? The quote you posted to me is from a section called Chance. The lines immediately preceding it are "Everything which has value is the product of a meeting, last throughout this meeting and cease when those things which met are separated. That is the central idea of Buddhism (the thought of Heraclitus). It leads straight to God."
By chance I was visiting her grave only last Sunday, just added some pics to the article. Im still hoping to totally rewrite it one day. Maybe not for a year or two, there are over a hundred thousand sources to sample, and its not easy to pick out the best ones to show the applicability of her ideas to the great problems. The need for her to be properly understood is greater now than ever before, with the global decline in religiosity, the "return of hunger" to which over a billion now suffer from, and with the rapidly expanding precariat to which millions (billions) more belong.
Eliot wrote that only the young are likely to have the clarity to grasp the applicability of her thought, so Ive been sending copies of Need for Roots to some up and coming politicians. One of them told me its been keeping her awake at night, and that she's recommended her to one of Ed Milibands senior advisers. So things are slowly happening. If they come together, it will be a kinder more just world that your beatutiful daughter grows up into, where she'll feel less need to take up the burden of the tzzadik, and be more free to enjoy the beauty of life. FeydHuxtable (talk) 19:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
- I shall write more later, but I am touched by your message.
- I rarely touch liquor, but I understand the appeal of a shot of vodka in the morning. For my part, I find reading Trotskyists and Roman Catholics invigorating. Ralph Miliband wrote a nice paragraph about the role of the working class (now paywalled, alas)] which is worth reading (but probably not worth tattooing on oneself).23:43, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, tried to sign up to buy the article, but the site kept saying Id failed to enter the anti spam code. Not sure about Miliband, but many left wing commentators in the 80s seemed almost too shell shocked to grasp what had happened. They did a lot pointless soul searching, not seeming to realise the underlying cause of the lefts fall from grace was the rightward shift of the global political centre that had took place between about 68 & 83. This article has quite a good overview of the main forces driving the change. And Embedded liberalism is not bad at indicating the quasi cyclical nature of these big shifts. If Im not misreading the political unconscious, we're almost due for another sea change, with the tipping point maybe in 2017. There's a risk that US republican insanity could derail things, but I tend to think the biggest danger is too far a shift to the left.
- Another reason why her work is now so relevant. She was one of the first left winger thinkers to suggest that the totalitarian left could be just as oppressive as the worst capitalists. The problem is always with the elite. She wrote that before there could be a revolution that generally improved conditions for regular people, it would be necessary to accurately understand the mechanics of social oppression. She came probably closer than anyone to doing this with her essay on Oppression and Liberty. Camus and dozens of others have called it the greatest political essay of the 20th century. Its interesting you mention Trotsky, although he was far closer to her thinking than Stalin, she still strongly disagreed with him both in print and in person. Apparently she was one of the very few who the better of him in debate, he was spluttering with rage and shouting, while she was calmly making her points. Have added this to the article, though made the claim more neutrally as Im not sure whether witnesses sympathetic to Trotsky would agree.
- Anyway, hope my message didnt come across as moribund. While the selfish elite are now causing more distress than ever, the fact that its now being felt by hundreds of millions of middle class folk, not just the inarticulate, means that the prospects for lasting positive change are better than in normal times. FeydHuxtable (talk) 11:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- I shall try to write later today or tomorrow. When we correspond we usually discuss serious matters, and I try to write with due care. Without attentiveness, affection does not suffice.
- Simone Weil's beautiful writings always strike me like Karen Carpenter's singing---so beautiful and so sad. Why the self-hatred and anti-Jewish writing for Weil? Why the anorexia for both, and for Gödel? Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- Anyway, hope my message didnt come across as moribund. While the selfish elite are now causing more distress than ever, the fact that its now being felt by hundreds of millions of middle class folk, not just the inarticulate, means that the prospects for lasting positive change are better than in normal times. FeydHuxtable (talk) 11:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
The pleasures of the community of Wikipedians
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
How about actually using the talk page rather than slap your bullshit tags all over the article? Or do you really think that it needs two NPOV tags? All the sources are also reliable, disagree? Take it to the appropriate board. Slapping tags all over an article and not using the talk page is disruptive and pointy editing, so use the talk page. Facts, not fiction (talk) 13:00, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
|
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Pumpkin Sky closed out the nom for DYK as rejected, he has reopened it now however. Do you think the article is now suitable to go ahead? Facts, not fiction (talk) 19:39, 3 September 2012 (UTC) KW is off again, the nomination may as well be withdrawn he will not drop it. I had hoped to bring a serious issue to public attention, all I got in return was abuse. I shall not bother with further DYK's. Thank you for your help. Facts, not fiction (talk) 21:11, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The above DYK hook fails verification, but it got verified (I guess that was an error) and now it is promoted. The hook says "that between 70 and 90 percent of women in Pakistan have suffered some form of sexual violence" but the actual source says "According to Human Rights Watch, studies on violence against women estimate that a woman in Pakistan is raped every two hours; approximately 70 to 90 percent of women suffer from some form of intimate partner violence". Can somebody please take a look into the matter please? The hook is currently in Queue 1. --SMS Talk 18:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
The Pakistani rape-claim needs to be tabled until it is properly vetted. 70%-90% of women is a rather large confidence interval for a proportion. It is difficult to imagine a human-subjects board allowing such a crappy study that would have so few subjects. On checking the poor reference
one finds vague references to "studies" by Humans Right Watch, which is an advocacy organization rather than a conventional reliable source. What the fuck is this doing on the queue for the main page of Wikipedia? Kiefer.Wolfowitz 19:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
I think I've set it all up so we can all discuss this expeditiously at Template:Did you know nominations/Rape in Pakistan: Revision. But I will note, Jrcla2, that either of the checkmarks/ticks means you believe it's ready. If you have a serious concern that you believe should be discussed first, next time please use one of the "there's a problem that needs resolving first" symbols. (Of course, part of the problem is that we've had less than a flood of passed articles of late, so they're getting promoted relatively soon after they are given the go-ahead. I had to scramble to do a QPQ review for my last one before it actually hit the Main Page, ahem :-) ) Yngvadottir (talk) 19:52, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Created/expanded by Darkness Shines (talk). Self nom at 17:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
|
The Signpost: 03 September 2012
- Technology report: Time for a MediaWiki Foundation?
- Featured content: Wikipedia's Seven Days of Terror
The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
- Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
- Research: The most recent DR data
- Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
- Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
- DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
- Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
- Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?
--The Olive Branch 19:12, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Need to change your signature.
The powers that be are turning on HTML5 in two weeks on WikiPedia. This should mean the elimination of <font> tag. Going thru my talk page and I noticed you used the font tag. There Is a page that helps out with formatting text or give me a buzz if you need help. Bgwhite (talk) 04:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the personalized heads-up! :)
- You directed me to a page that describes the font tag, so I am not worried yet. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 09:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guitar chord, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Triad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Resolved |
---|
Hi, Kiefer.Wolfowitz. Since you've had to advise Jarble on Wikipedia formatting issues before (in your case WP:OVERLINKING), would you mind weighing in on the linked discussion? 46.165.208.13 (talk) 18:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
|
Thanks for your message about stats by Henryk
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Extended content
|
---|
Thanks for your message about stats by Henrik but these informations "Emw's version is a visual tool written by Emw, based off of Henrik's data. Trending Topics, provides detailed view. Also does not go as far back in time as stats.grok.se WikiRoll: top viewed pages of the day/week/month/year on some Wikipedias, by Maciej Smoleński. WikiTrends: articles with biggest view increases (only Wikipedia) Wiki-Watch: Last 30 days, also works when stats.grosk.se is down. For Wikipedia English. For Wikipedia German: de.wiki-watch.de/ Raw data used for third party programs or analyzing (Henrik's source); see also User:Emijrp/Wikipedia_Archive#Domas_visits_logs" aren't useful. Stats by Henrik are out of order. And we don't know why... That's a pity. Thanks a lot again and best regards. IP, 8 September 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.4.38.247 (talk) 05:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC) This be the message: Man hands on misery to man
|
Invitation to comment at Monty Hall problem RfC
You are invited to comment on the following probability-related RfC: Talk:Monty Hall problem#Conditional or Simple solutions for the Monty Hall problem? --Guy Macon (talk) 17:14, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, but this seems like a headache. I trust Richard Gill's judgment. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 17:43, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Guy,
- RfCs usually should be a last resort. The Information Technology RfC seems to have been premature, and two edits counter-productive:
- Unless you are aiming to escalate irritation into conflict, please do not blue-link policy to established editors, particularly late at night.
- Also, unless you are being deliberately provocative, do not put templates on the talk pages of established editors.
- We all make mistakes. I wish you luck with IT and MHP. Sincerely, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:41, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Grooveshark screenshot of King Crimson work.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Grooveshark screenshot of King Crimson work.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
IP editor at work again
Hi Sven and bot!
An IP editor removed the screen-shot, along with discussion of copyright infringement from the lede.
Same old, same old.
Maybe somebody should add Fripp's statement that UMG is worse than Grooveshark?
Sincerely, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 09:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 September 2012
- From the editor: Signpost adapts as news consumption changes
- Featured content: Not a "Gangsta's Paradise", but still rappin'
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Fungi
- Special report: Two Wikipedians set to face jury trial
- Technology report: Mmmm, milkshake...
- Discussion report: Closing Wikiquette; Image Filter; Education Program and Momento extensions
Hey K-Wolf
Good to hear from you. On to political guitarists, eh? I've been working on Oregon pioneer history over the last week or so. What they did to the Native American population here in the 1840s and 1850s was flat out genocide, it would seem. Pretty interesting, I'm learning as I go. best, Carrite (talk) 03:08, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- Patt was an honest geologist, in my judgment, and he just said that some DOE models made unrealistic or unsupported assumptions, which might seriously understate the risks for contamination. This is usually what scientists do when consulting! ;)
- The Argentinian Indian Wars were pretty bad, also. I think that the USA's Native American population has recovered its pre-conquest numbers, about 2 million. (How does one count mestizos?)
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:50, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Just an FYI, I undid your BOLD edits to the page until the discussion plays out, and also added an unsigned template to the discussion you started pbp 15:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- Von Neumann and Kolmogorov are orders of magnitude more important than Gödel or Turing, so I have trouble imagining that revert as supported by any mathematician.
- The others could have some discussion, I suppose, although Gibbs and Fourier and either Pearson or Fisher should be added. Peirce should be added also. It's hard to imagine Nietzsche or Freud, etc., being judged important in comparison. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:19, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 September 2012
- From the editor: Signpost expands to Facebook
- WikiProject report: Action! — The Indian Cinema Task Force
- Featured content: Go into the light
- Technology report: Future-proofing: HTML5 and IPv6
Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!
- Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
- Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
- Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
- You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).
If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
- Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
- Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
- When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Your Questia online library codes failed to deliver
We tried to use Wikipedia email to deliver your account access information but you either did not provide an email address in your preferences or had it set up not to receive messages from other editors. You can change both on the first page of Special:Preferences. To fix the situation directly or to let me know you've changed your preferences, just email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers, Ocaasi 05:30, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Major thirds tuning: Fair-image pictures from Patt
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Extended content
|
---|
I've removed the image from the article once again. Talk page or no talk page, good article review or no good article review, the image lacks a rationale for this usage (and thus fails NFCC#10c) and it is not clear what readers are losing by not seeing this particular guitar (and so it seemingly fails NFCC#8). I'm happy to discuss it, but it unambiguously fails at least one of the NFCC, and so does not belong in the article at this time, and, in any case, the burden of proof falls on you to demonstrate that it does meet the criteria, not to me to prove that it doesn't. J Milburn (talk) 15:28, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Vanilla bookDisplaying the cover allows the reader to understand the meaning of "vanilla" and avoids OR. Without the cover displayed, I would add a sentence about Lester Young and cite the book-cover. Would that be acceptable to you, Reaper Eternal? Kiefer.Wolfowitz 16:54, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
|
The Signpost: 24 September 2012
- In the media: Editor's response to Roth draws internet attention
- Recent research: "Rise and decline" of Wikipedia participation, new literature overviews, a look back at WikiSym 2012
- WikiProject report: 01010010 01101111 01100010 01101111 01110100 01101001 01100011 01110011
- News and notes: UK chapter rocked by Gibraltar scandal
- Technology report: Signpost investigation: code review times
- Featured content: Dead as...
- Discussion report: Image filter; HotCat; Syntax highlighting; and more
If you could review this really quick
Done. Reliably sourced, NPOV
|
---|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Since User:Bouchecl doesn't appear to have edited for a few days, I need a second opinion on User:PParmley's draft before implementing it. The requested edit is for the article Pacific Gas and Electric Company, which PParmley has been steadily improving over the past few months through userspace drafts and requests for implementation at PAIDHELP. The talk page section for the most recent requested change is here. And the requested draft to be implemented is at User:PParmley/PG&E History part 5. draft. It's a lot simpler than past drafts PParmley has made because it's not replacing or rewriting info, but adding in missing info, namely info about the 1950's to the 1980's, which is completely missing from the current history section in the article. If you could look everything over and leave a comment in the talk page section on whether anything needs to be changed in the draft or whether it's good to be implemented, I would appreciate it. SilverserenC 01:24, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
|
What do you mean?
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Extended content
|
---|
I understand you want it "given a rest" but I disagree, given the charge and countercharges. However, I did not understand these remarks: ":Alan,
Why would filing an Arbcom request notice be a invitation to block and what does whether anyone can block, matter for posting the standard arbitration notice? Alanscottwalker (talk) 15:58, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
|
Fair play
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Greetings friend. It would be great to see more thoughtful consideration from you when you feign interest in an important site-wide discussion. I know when you are feigning because I know what you are capable of; and I weigh that against your edits. Cutting to the chase, I'd like you to reduce the text wall you added here which detracts, to a concise statement regarding your point. I hope to hear from you or simply see this reduction soon, if you are around. I appreciate your understanding. 76Strat String da Broke da (talk) 04:07, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
|
The Signpost: 01 October 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Founder: Jimmy Wales
- News and notes: Independent review of UK chapter governance; editor files motion against Wikitravel owners
- Featured content: Mooned
- Technology report: WMF and the German chapter face up to Toolserver uncertainty
- WikiProject report: The Name's Bond... WikiProject James Bond
Guitars: Tunings and chords
I made the images File:Tritone in the chromatic circle.png, File:Augmented chord in the chromatic circle.png, and File:Diminished seventh chord in the chromatic circle.png for use in place of the image of the chromatic circle in the regular tunings section. Hyacinth (talk) 06:06, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Geometry of repetitive, regular guitar-tunings
-
A line segment bisecting the chromatic circle specifies an augmented-fourths (tritone) tuning.
-
An equilateral triangle circumscribed by the chromatic circle specifies a major-thirds tuning.
-
A square circumscribed by the chromatic circle specifies a minor-thirds tuning.
- Wow!
- You are a beautiful human-being, Hyacinth!
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz 06:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. Would you be interested in a similar picture for all fourths, all fifths, and new standard tunings? Hyacinth (talk) 01:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- The tunings you mentioned are not associated with regular polygons, so that they would be messy. Maybe you could find a good-looking spiral for the non-repetitive regular tunings...?
- There are regular tunings that are not discussed. It would be interesting to have symmetric-star pictures for the "unison" (a big dot at the C note), half-note (a regular 12-gon), and whole-note (a regular hexagon) tunings. Sethares states that these tunings are less interesting, although it is possible to play e.g. major chords in the whole-note tuning. An article on regular tunings could mention them briefly, and illustrate them. Wikipedia has an article calling "unison" tuning ostrich tuning.
- Sethares also discusses augmented-fifths and sixths tunings, perhaps because he composes electronic music. All-fifths C-G-D-A-E-B already exceeds the range of guitars (perhaps even with Gary Goodman's Octave4Plus strings ...). I can briefly mention the really weird tunings in a separate section in the regular-tunings spin-off article.
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:36, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Hyacinth! Your drawings look even better on a MacBook Pro! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:53, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Non-repetitive regular guitar-tunings
See File:All fifths tuning in the chromatic circle.png, File:All fourths tuning in the chromatic circle.png, and File:New standard tuning in the chromatic circle.png. Hyacinth (talk) 23:13, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Lefty–righty tunings: Ordering the notes
- These are very good, once again!
- :)
- From graphs to directed graphs?
- A confession: I scratched my head—waiting for the morning coffee to caffeinate my neural network—to see the same note-sequence in all-fourths and all-fifths tunings.
- Then I remembered, duh! The all-fifths and all-fourths tunings are righty-lefty inversions, so that one reverses the order of the sequences. I had planned to write more about righty-lefty tunings, following Sethares, but your diagram illustrates the importance of such inversions.
- Perhaps one could replace the edges with arcs/arrowss? Arcs/arrows would make the illustrations self-explanatory.
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz 07:54, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- The regular-tunings section has grown so that it can be a spin-off article, and has been moved to regular tunings. In the original article, I shortened the guitar tunings#Regular to be in summary style.
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:36, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
A good-article collaboration?
- Regular tunings
- Who would like to help improve this article to GA status?
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz 14:04, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Take Five: All-fifths tuning for orchestral-instruments
Hello. You have a new message at Gilderien's talk page.
--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 19:00, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
- A thoughtful and courteous discussion took place at the WikiProject Music Theory. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Infobox: Not too shabby
Major thirds | |
---|---|
Aliases | All thirds |
Interval | Major third |
Semitones | 4 |
Example(s) | E-G♯-c-e-g♯-c'-e' D♯-G-b-d♯-g-b'-d'♯ |
Other instruments | Seven-string guitar |
Repetition | After 3 strings |
Advantages | Reduced hand-stretching: major and minor chords on 2 consecutive frets |
Disadvantages | Reduced range on 6 strings |
Left-handed tuning | Minor sixths tuning |
Associated musician | |
Guitarist | Ralph Patt |
Regular tunings (semitones) | |
Trivial (0) | |
Minor thirds (3) | |
Major thirds (4) | |
All fourths (5) | |
Augmented fourths (6) | |
New standard (7, 3) | |
All fifths (7) | |
Minor sixths (8) | |
Guitar tunings |
For your viewing pleasure. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 20:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Major-thirds tuning: A gallery
The good, ...
-
The fingerboard is covered by four-finger segments, reducing finger-stretching.
-
Chords may be shifted three strings, just changing the octave.
-
Inverting chords is easy.
-
Notes and chords may be shifted diagonally.
-
Major and minor chords may be played on three consecutive strings on two consecutive frets.
-
A progression of three chords in major-thirds tuning.
..., the bad, and the ugly!: The CAGED syndrome
Let us quote from Guitar chords:
-
C major chord (sic.)
-
A Major Chord (sic.)
-
G Major Chord (sic.)
-
E Major Chord (sic.)
-
D Major Chord (sic.)
Notice that the shapes are different for each of these so-called major chords. In truth, none of these chords are major chords, according to the definitions taught in music for other instruments: No wonder guitarists have difficulty discussing music!
Worse, for each of these chords, there are three other shapes that must be learned, according to the position on the fretboard.
Playing in standard tuning cripples the mind (and often the body) and its teaching should be criminalized.
- (after E. W. Dijkstra's remark on COBOL)
Kiefer.Wolfowitz 18:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Ralph Patt, inventor of major-thirds tuning
DYK for Ralph Patt
On 3 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ralph Patt, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the music of Ornette Coleman, John Coltrane, and Arnold Schoenberg inspired jazz-guitarist Ralph Patt to invent major-thirds tuning? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ralph Patt. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Good-article nomination: Review of Ralph Patt
I have begun the GA review. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:00, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Reaper Eternal!
- I noticed that you'd begun, and it brought me great pleasure---following delayed dinner after our daughter was crying and then only able to sleep on me and now has awoken hungry---so my dinner is further delayed!
- I agree with your comments. I'm disappointed that I had not caught the syntax snafu in the lede. I shall have to learn about notes and references. Geometry guy and Malleus had tried previously to teach me; I think Malleus's page has had a recent discussion that could serve as a tutorial.
- As always, best regards, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 18:04, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
- It's actually not that difficult, and I can do that part if you would like. Basically, you use two reference lists, one with
{{Reflist|group="note"}}
and the other would remain the standard{{Reflist}}
. For what is currently Ref 3, you would write as<ref name="whatever" group="note">...</ref>
. For all the other references, you simply would not use the group parameter. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:51, 12 September 2012 (UTC)- Hey, I know you've been busy, but could you give me a timeline on when you'll get back to my review? Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:12, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your patience, Reaper.
- I finished what I want to change. I should wait a day and proofread it for new typos, and make sure that the syntax is English. :)
- I want to keep the Williams death-notice as a secondary source for the date of death and as a secondary source for The Vanilla Book, which cites Patt's description; it gives the cause of death. The Death Notice source uses the USA's Social Security database of deaths, and at least one similar site gives the same information, and so this does not seem problematic to me; in principle, for 1500 USD I could get the database, or I could beg somebody from Oregon or the BLP projects to provide a more precise source---which would also be difficult to check. Alternatively, we could remove the death date and the cause of death, but these seem standard for biographies. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 20:24, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hey, I know you've been busy, but could you give me a timeline on when you'll get back to my review? Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:12, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- It's actually not that difficult, and I can do that part if you would like. Basically, you use two reference lists, one with
Category:Repetitive guitar-tunings
A category led to an article, so lemons do make lemonade
|
---|
Category:Repetitive guitar-tunings, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:25, 7 September 2012 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The discussion continued.... The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
|
Do not get disillusioned
The work you are doing looks to me to be valid for the encyclopaedia. We simply suffer form the wisdom of crowds not always being true wisdom. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 10:16, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
- Don't worry about it. (TPH may be a crowd of one!)
- Hyacinth has a lot of experience on Wikipedia, and his cat (if he has one) has forgotten more about music than I'll never know. He's made a lot of contributions to articles and has provided a lot of personal help and kindnesses to me, also.
- I think that the issue justly raised by the possible-neologism template is better addressed by a discussion of WP:OR/Synthesis policy. (I had hesitated to write the article because of my own concerns about Synthesis; I wrote the introductory paragraph to help the reader per WP:IAR, even though there are no known references sufficiently abstract to cite for that paragraph. Well, now the paragraph is removed, and the world continues....)
- Thanks for the kind note and 'attaboy!
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz 10:29, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Repetitive tuning
On 21 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Repetitive tuning, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that major-thirds guitar-tuning is a repetitive tuning in which chords are raised an octave by shifting all notes by three strings on the same frets (illustrated)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Repetitive tuning. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For your efforts to date in improving Guitar chords. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:11, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
- Thank you, Dr. Blofeld!
- This means a lot coming from an expert on guitar chords! :)
- Did you know that Adrian Belew is from Covington, Kentucky?
- Best regards, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 19:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
"She will outstrip all praise, And make it halt behind her."
Kiefer.Wolfowitz 19:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Horticulture: Nearing harvest
- Just butting in to say I've noticed (and been really pleased by) the changes in you, as well. So have others. How's the "fruit" doing? Pesky (talk) 08:45, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Well. The fruit is ripe for the picking, but as a Rastafarian I must wait for it to fall from the tree. ;D Kiefer.Wolfowitz 09:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Just butting in to say I've noticed (and been really pleased by) the changes in you, as well. So have others. How's the "fruit" doing? Pesky (talk) 08:45, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Tim Minchin
- Heh! Well, judging from personal experience in the issues, don't hold your breath! Meanwhile, this link is one you should keep. It may stop insanity. (Adding: besides which, the guy is an awesomely talented musician.) Pesky (talk) 10:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- I can't quite recall how I ended up here, but thanks, Pesky for that introduction to Tim Minchin. I'd never heard of him. Bielle (talk) 01:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Heh! Well, judging from personal experience in the issues, don't hold your breath! Meanwhile, this link is one you should keep. It may stop insanity. (Adding: besides which, the guy is an awesomely talented musician.) Pesky (talk) 10:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Wikibreak
I shall be away for a few days. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 06:51, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Wheeeee! Pesky (talk) 06:51, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- I need sleep. My wife and daughter are awesome! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 21:17, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Gods and all Good Things bless the baby girl :o) What are you calling her? Pesky (talk) 04:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- I need sleep. My wife and daughter are awesome! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 21:17, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- My wife was so very happy that when I called our unborn daughter "Little Honey" when I started talking to her that "Little Honey" is her nickname. ;)
- "Diana" honors a mathematician who catalyzed my writing my wife, on her birthday it turned out; I am happy that "DiaNA" also recognizes with my wife, who is a geneticist. Diana is also international and mythologically a strong woman.
- "Sandra" honors my mother's best friend and our neighbor, whose house has always been open to me and my family. It is a feminization of Alexander, and so means "she who rules men (andros)". She is ruling me, already! :D It also connotes Cassandra, "she who ensnares men", and of course the beautiful prophet who maintained her integrity and told Apollo that she was not interested; may she have greater serenity to shut her mouth when she knows she is right but others are not ready to listen than her father!
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz 11:07, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Genuine Barnstar | |
KW, I present this barnstar in commemoration of the recent birth in your family. Petaluma, California was the center of the universe for Jewish socialist chicken ranchers 100 years ago. That was the environment where my father-in-law was born. That's where I took this photograph. Thank you for all that you do for Wikipedia, and I bid you peace. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC) |
- Thank you, dear Jim!
- We're very tired but my wife and daughter are doing great!
- Warm regards, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 21:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Jim,
- I was so tired that I forgot to note that "barn" means "child" in Swedish, so your award was---to sound like Frenchie in "Small Time Crooks" as she finished the first letter in the dictionary---apposite!
- Cheers, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 16:03, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
For the little one
Blessings | |
May she be happy; May the spirits of Love and Laughter walk alongside her all her life; |
- Thank you, Pesky!
- That is beautiful!
- :)
- Love,
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- This is great! Congratulations to you and your wife Kiefer! Ryan Vesey 13:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Give her some cuddles from me :o) Pesky (talk) 06:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- This is great! Congratulations to you and your wife Kiefer! Ryan Vesey 13:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Congratulations!
I saw your mention of your news on Drmies's talk page. Congratulations to you also! LadyofShalott 00:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you, my Lady! :)
- Congratulations! All the best! We had our 3rd (grandchild) last month :)...Modernist (talk) 00:54, 1 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Best wishes to your children and congratulations to you. I think that grandchildren add years to their grandparents' lives---more than offsetting the years lost due to the stressors and sleep-deprivation of the grandparents' becoming parents, first! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Just got back off hols and seen your news. Congratulations - daughters are wonderful (I have three). --Elen of the Roads (talk) 01:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you, Elen! I am so happy that we were lucky enough to have a daughter first! She will mature faster and help her mom to keep me in line! :) Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ha, good werk, Elen--I screwed up on the third one, which turns out to be of the male persuasion. Drmies (talk) 02:29, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Drmies! I had lost count of your children. Perhaps you once counted your son before he was born? Congratulations to you and your wife, and give extra hugs to your daughters, who finally have a little brother to dress up! :)10:00, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Congrats, Kiefer!! --Dylan620 (I'm all ears) 01:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, so much Dylan! :) Warm regards, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 10:00, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Whoa Kiefer, you procreated! Congratulations! Nothing beats the very first one--but I have to say that I thought that number three wouldn't move as much, and then he came out, and I still well up thinking about it. After two girls we now have a boy, and I promise to raise them all as manly as possible. My best and much love to you and Mrs. Wolfowitz, and to junior of course. Now get some sleep, as much as possible. Call me if you need anything. ;) Drmies (talk) 01:57, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks again Drmies! The first days were trying on me, and even on the Mrs. Wolfowitz, whom (having thrived despite my efforts) I'd never seen cry before. She'd at most teared when watching "The Thornbirds", etc. I wasn't allowed to stay overnight the first two nights, and the first night our daughter was awake almost the whole night---surveying her new kingdom! :)
- Congrats to you! Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 02:00, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, Dennis! :) Kiefer.Wolfowitz 10:00, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Please see Father. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 12:49, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Mrs. KW and I are very touched and flattered and humbled by your edit, Dennis! Thanks so much! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Objectively, there is no doubt it adds depth, emotion and quality to the article. I'm just happy for your contribution in helping me improve that article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 00:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Mrs. KW and I are very touched and flattered and humbled by your edit, Dennis! Thanks so much! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Please see Father. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 12:49, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, Dennis! :) Kiefer.Wolfowitz 10:00, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- How wonderful, another new life (after the daughter of Khazar and the son of Drmies), there is nothing more precious, and nothing as revolutionary as the first time (days, weeks ...) together, enjoy every minute with your ladies! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:37, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- My world has been turned upside down, happily, as you predicted, Gerda! Thanks for the thoughts! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- congratulations from me too! Sasha (talk) 20:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, Sasha! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- She's beautiful Kiefer! Ryan Vesey 13:36, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks so much, Ryan! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support .. errr .. I mean - Congratulations KW!! Absolutely beautiful. Always so great to see such beauty and wonder amid the noise and haste of WP. — ChedZILLA 14:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for the good wishes and appreciation of our daughter! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Aaaahhhh, she's gorgeous! Pesky (talk) 07:58, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks again! I'm blushing on her behalf! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Congratulations to the both of you! WormTT(talk) 08:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks so much David! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- So cute! God bless you and your family. FeydHuxtable (talk) 16:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you FeydHuxtable! "Meditation on the chance which led to the meeting of my mother and father is even more salutary than meditation on death." Kiefer.Wolfowitz 18:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Congratulations!
A binky for your little one | |
Looks like you'll need a few of these! Congratulations on your newest family member! SarahStierch (talk) 20:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much, Sarah!
- I've already had use of the dummy/pacifiers. I've had to bite down really hard when she doesn't want to sleep at 3 a.m.! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:52, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- That's why God gave us bourbon. FWIW, we never used pacifiers, though at ages 3 and 6 they make me change my mind. That's a nice photo, Kiefer. It's an indescribable feeling, isn't it. Enjoy, and make sure you teach her rock and roll--they don't do that in school. Drmies (talk) 05:00, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- She seems to enjoy Barney's songs the most, and listening to running water. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 16:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- That's why God gave us bourbon. FWIW, we never used pacifiers, though at ages 3 and 6 they make me change my mind. That's a nice photo, Kiefer. It's an indescribable feeling, isn't it. Enjoy, and make sure you teach her rock and roll--they don't do that in school. Drmies (talk) 05:00, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Precious
tuning | |
Thank you for quality articles on tuning and mathematicians, even fictitious ones, for tuned comments to well-wishers, and for striving for serenity when you are "right but others are not ready to listen", - you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:43, 22 August 2012 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much!
- I should clarify that I just copy-edited the article on Mikhail Kadets, which was written by Sodin ("Sasha"), on whose articles its always a pleasure to work. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 10:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I used to play dobro in an open D tuning, tuned down a step to C (CGCGCE I believe). Down tuned to make it sound a little "sloppier" for blues. For some odd reason, I found it quite comfortable although I'm guessing that is not a common tuning for slide. That was back in my younger days, before the tendons went bad. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 00:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- I love the sound of Dobro (resonator) guitar and its depiction on the Dire Straits album, Brothers in Arms, one of my favorites. Sorry to hear about your pains. I wish I had written major thirds tuning earlier, to save your tendons! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Started before I could read, irregular gigs from 16 up until I was 40, in the finest dives and holes in the wall America has to offer, mainly blues and country music. The tendon damage was well earned, although apparently irreparable as I've seen a dozen specialists. And I am a Fender man, customized "93 Telecaster + Hot Rod Deluxe or Laney LC50, plus other toys from the 60-70s, and keys, bass, etc. I had my time, I have no regrets. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 10:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- I love the sound of Dobro (resonator) guitar and its depiction on the Dire Straits album, Brothers in Arms, one of my favorites. Sorry to hear about your pains. I wish I had written major thirds tuning earlier, to save your tendons! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- I used to play dobro in an open D tuning, tuned down a step to C (CGCGCE I believe). Down tuned to make it sound a little "sloppier" for blues. For some odd reason, I found it quite comfortable although I'm guessing that is not a common tuning for slide. That was back in my younger days, before the tendons went bad. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 00:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
I've uploaded the screenshot you sent me. Since you know better than I what its intended use is, I'll leave placing the image to you. Cheers, Sven Manguard Wha? 01:39, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, wow... congratulations on the baby! Sven Manguard Wha? 02:39, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your help with the file and especially for your congratulating me! :)
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:23, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks again, Sven. It seems that that image gets 30 viewers a day, which is substantial given its fair-use restriction to only Grooveshark. The uploading does seem to have been useful. Thanks again for all of your help. You are a great editor! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 20:29, 26 August 2012 (UTC)