Welcome! edit

Hi Khwiser! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

But… please don't bother leaving welcome notes for editors who have just registered and haven't edited yet. It's a waste of your time (and Wikipedia's bandwidth!) as 90%+ of newly registered accounts never edit, welcomed or not.

Also, welcoming in this way can get in the way of people who are monitoring for vandalism by creating false impressions of activity, slowing down a vital job. Thanks! — Trey Maturin 11:54, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ghulam Rasool Dehlvi edit

Hello, Khwiser,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TartarTorte and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Ghulam Rasool Dehlvi, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TartarTorte}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TartarTorte 03:51, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, Khwiser. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 07:21, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Asjad Raza Khan edit

Just gone through your edit history, you have Drafted the article. I would ask if you’re here for attacking, please do not and if you think that the subject is not notable you can try XFD, but don’t Draft it, you’re not an experienced user. Thanks and Regards — QuadriSyedSahab(T · C 15:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Shut up your nonsense. I have never attacked anybody. This time if you abuse multiple accounts I will take both of your Muftis to AFD and report your ID to moderators. Khwiser (talk) 11:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Khwiser Haha, you’re attacking only. Do whatever you want to do. — QuadriSyedSahab(T · C 11:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Inappropriate draftification edit

Hi, I have reverted your inappropriate draftification of Asjad Raza Khan per WP:ATD-I because this is not a new article and has previously survived two AfDs. If you believe the article doesn't satisfy notability, you are free to nominate it for deletion. Best regards, ─ Aafī (talk) 19:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please don't draftify articles in an inappropriate way. Please initiate a deletion discussion rather to involve wider community input. ─ Aafī (talk) 13:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I can initiate an AfD on your behalf if you would want to. ─ Aafī (talk) 13:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I moved it back to main space after doing a Merge. It was inappropriate to draftify a 5 year old article THREE times! Please review WP:DRAFTIFY for guidance on when draftification is appropriate. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Pretty much the same I was telling this user. I have restored the cats. @Khwiser, Meanwhile, if you believe the previous two AfDs have been unfair and the subject's notability is not established, feel free to AfD it for a third time. Draftification does not apply here. ─ Aafī (talk) 06:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm Liz. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 07:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Khwiser,
Disagreements happen every day on Wikipedia, it's the nature of collaborative editing. But that doesn't give you license to cast aspersions about other editors unless you have evidence you are willing to share. "Suspicions" do not count if they are not backed up by diffs/edits. And don't fall into edit-warring, that behavior can result in a loss of editing privileges. Learn how to voice your disagreement civilly.
If you have questions about editor conflict or editing on Wikipedia, you can bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 07:54, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply