Khushimasson
| This user is a student editor in Carleton_University/History_of_Sexuality_(Winter) . |
Peer Review edit
Hey Khushimasson! I had the pleasure of peer-reviewing your article for our class. Overall it was a fantastic article and I really enjoyed reading it!
Lead section: The lead section is easy to understand, clearly illustrates the importance of the topic and summarizes the article and reflects it in great detail. Additionally, the lead section balances its approach to the article and does not give more weight to certain sections than others.
Structure and writing quality: The sections are organized in a sensible order that introduces the story of Sarah Baartman and her impact. Additionally, the information in the article is relevant and clearly describes the topic.
Images and Media:
The article includes a variety of images that relate to the topic.
Balancing act:
The article presents the history of Sarah Baartman in a representative way of her actual history. Additionally, each section is appropriate in its size and relates to the topic. Furthermore, the article does not attempt to convince readers to accept one particular point of view and reflects the different perspectives who were a part of Sarah Baatman’s story.
Neutral content:
The article is written in a neutral tone that exemplifies the requirements of Wikipedia. There are not examples in the article of words, phrase or claims that do not feel neutral. The perspective of the author cannot be determined by reading the article.
Reliable sources
All of the statements in the article are sourced, and the citations used are supported by appropriate and reliable references. Three of the references are from reputable journals, news articles, and books. The sources are neutral and vary in their period of publication. Additionally, statements in the article are not too reliable on a single source. Bdan2525 (talk) 18:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)