177th Guards Naval Infantry Regiment edit

Dear Kges1901, I am considering moving and changing the 77th Guards Rifle Division article into an article for the new 177th Guards NIR in the Caspian Flotilla. I am just about sure it inherits the lineage of the 77 GRD, but cannot find so far the full honorific "Moskovsko-Chernigovskaya order of Lenin Red Banner order of Suvorov" attributed to the new(ish) regiment. Do you have anything which would be definitive? Also thanks and cc Wreck_Smurfy and B.Velikov, effectively the other current members of the Red Army editors' group. Buckshot06 (talk) 03:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Because the 77th GRD could be expanded into a detailed long article covering its WWII history, I would keep the 77th GRD article as it is, and create a separate article for the new regiment that covers the history of the unit as naval infantry since 1998. This article [1] explains the lineage of the regiment, and suggests there is continuity. I haven't found any sources that refer to the unit as guards, however, and we can't invent a designation for it without sources. Kges1901 (talk)
    • I agree with Kges1901 that the existing 77th GRD article should stand (and be expanded, but that's way down on my "to do" list). What I can confirm is the honorific, at least in part. The first formation of the 173rd RD got "Moscow" because it derived from the 21st Moscow Opolchenie Division, and the 77th GRD won the battle honor "Chernigov" on September 21, 1943.[1] Wreck Smurfy (talk) 18:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Many thanks Kges1901!! The 810th Guards was actually higher priority than the 177th!! Now there is something to build upon!! Buckshot06 (talk) 00:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Georgia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability for this very incomplete, abandoned list.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022 edit

 
 
New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello Kges1901/2022,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 816 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 861 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

 

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Liechtenstein has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:LISTN. Incomplete (no idea which years it supposedly covers, but e.g. 1980 stamps are missing), abandoned, unsourced since creation in 2015, and unread (18 pageviews in the last 90 days).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Liechtenstein has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive edit

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.
Click here to opt out of any future messages.

(t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

New Russian regimental categories edit

Dear Kges1901, you have now created these categories that I was considering. I did not do so as yet because they're all under 20 members, thus violating SMALLCAT. That's why I was thinking we would have to create more regimental articles before creating the specific categories. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:37, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • I considered that, but given the war and increasing meadia coverage of regiments, I believe the number of articles will increase so they don't run afoul of WP:SMALLCAT. Also I've seen a large number of small categories that have never been deleted as well. At worst I can create more regiment articles to fill in redlinks. Kges1901 (talk) 01:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXCIII, May 2022 edit

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of people on the postage stamps of Liechtenstein for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people on the postage stamps of Liechtenstein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people on the postage stamps of Liechtenstein until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 08:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply