User talk:Kges1901/2014/July

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Mz7. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, EdgewoodAve.com, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 20:48, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Webster92109 responding to your message on All About Vision

Hi. I further edited the All About Vision page by removing superlatives and adding references. I hope that helps. Webster92109 (talk) 22:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webster92109 (talk • contribs) 22:33, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Review for Vizidrix.com

I would appreciate a re-evaluation of the speed deletion recommendation. I'm not terribly familiar with the process so any information that would help meet terms would also be appreciated.

Vizidrix (talk) 22:39, 2 July 2014 (UTC)my talk page

Additional All About Vision Feedback

Hi. I'd appreciate any constructive criticism you can offer, although the page I wrote has already been deleted. I reviewed other medical website pages before writing mine, to get an idea of how to do a better job than what exists. I'm not sure how pages like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinical_Advisor and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renal_%26_Urology_News and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_News_Today have a place in Wikipedia. I believe I offered substantially more information, but clearly my effort was still lacking in some way, and I'd love to know how. Thanks in advance for your input. Webster92109 (talk) 16:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets

Hello Kges1901. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:39, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, List of Demon's Souls characters, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. - MrX 03:25, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Promotional message on Zeek page

Hi, I'm yofisimon> You instantly ask for the speed deletion of the Zeek page I made, protesting a promotional message. I don't see any kind of promotional message, but if something in the page has to be removed, quote me it and it will be removed instantly. Thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yofisimon (talk • contribs) 14:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

C-STEM

Hi, I'm CSTEMWiki. It's my first time ever doing a Wikipedia page so the things I typed seems to be promotional. Can you quote the sentences or areas that it may seem to be promotional? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CSTEMWiki (talk • contribs) 20:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

New Page Patrol

Hi there. Thank you for patrolling new pages. However, after a review of some of your patrols and taking into account that you are very new here with fewer than 300 edits, I think it would help you to review some of our policies and guidelines concerning deletion and new page rewieving, before you do any more patrolling. The information you need is found essentially at WP:NPP and WP:DELETION, but if you need any help don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page although I may be a b it slow to respond for the moment. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Hari vishnu kamath, Kges1901.

Unfortunately MrX has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

This article should not have been unreviewed before addressing the WP:COPYVIO issue.

To reply, leave a comment on MrX's talk page.

I remove all talk sections so please do not remove our college page

Hello

First I thank you for you review our college page and aware me the errors so i remove on urgent basis. I got the exact error and I delete talk sections so now our college article is fine and well update from me so kindly do not delete the page (Universal Business School - India) Regards Mayur System Admin Universal business School

Elizabeth anne edwards

You were a bit eager to delete this. I got four minutes between creating the page and putting some placeholder text before you got rid of it. That's outrageous. I entered the proper text within five minutes, I hope you'll add it all back. As far as I can see the content is good.

Althea Vega page

Hi Kges1901 please don't delete the Althea Vega page. I'm still in the process of editing it. It's still a work in progress.

Order of the Crown of Georgia

Hi!! I saw you posted the speedy deletion tag in the article of the Order of the Crown of Georgia. I understand you followed the stablished procedure, but the last article (deleted in 2012) was deleted by consensus because no one replied the two editors who wrote there saying the Order is fake because the Dynasty is fake. Without giving any source or similar information.

The Bagration Dynasty is recognised by the government of Georgia. Prince Davit Bagration has been invited as Prince of Georgia tomultiple National acts, and many Georgian public figures belong to the Dynastic Orders of the House of Bagration. Same happens with the Georgian Orthodox Church, whos Patriarch Ilija II officially recognised Prince Davit and proclaimed his son Giorgi heir to the Dynastic rights after baptising him (see the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocGIdtlAukY).

The website of the Royal House was not considered as a reliable source by these two editors, but there are other materials set as sources a part from these ones. Since 2012 the Order gained more recognition and can be seen being worn by multiple people in Dynastic events.

This is why I ask you, even if I appealed the tag, to change the tag and use at least a normal deletion one, in order for me to give appropiate arguments. It is a young order and needs to have more time to gobe internationally known.

Regards!!

Alexeinikolayevichromanov (talk) 13.22, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Celltrion Healthcare

Hello. I think Celltrion Healthcare page should not be speedily deleted because I didn't intended this contents for a promotion. I just think that someone(especially someone who search about korean bio company) search the biosimilar product, this company's info can be useful. So please reconsider about speedy deletion. Thank you.