Welcome! edit

Hello, Kevinmanji, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Bleak, thank you for your response. I'm a bit confused. When I contributed, I edited the content with absolute truthfulness and objectivity, without any advertising content. May I ask for your help for editing? Kevinmanji (talk) 09:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi Bleak, thank you for your response. I'm a bit confused. When I contributed, I edited the content with absolute truthfulness and objectivity, without any advertising content. May I ask for your help for editing? tank you so much! Kevinmanji (talk) 09:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]Reply
Jimfbleak. Primefac (talk) 09:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reply edit

Thanks, Primefac

Kevinmanji, you have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at Kevinmanji. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kevinmanji|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

  • you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
  • please don't repeat refs, give them a name. Your refs include one that is surely a mistake, and one that is a promotional press release. Most only confirm what the company sells and who its founders are. Only the funding is notable, but that's sourced to a Nullman press release and doesn't say where the money comes from
  • The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
  1. significant coverage in
  2. independent,
  3. multiple,
  4. reliable,
  5. secondary sources.
Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.
  • It's all about what the company sells, little about the company itself other than a location (even that's vague "Silicon Valley"). To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, management structure, turnover or profits
  • You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
  • With virtually no facts, you just seem to be name-checking the firm, with company-speak like offers ADAS/AD solutions rather than sells ADAS/AD technology
  • There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
  • You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
  • I didn't check

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Bleak, thanks for the reply; it's very helpful. If a company is listed on Nasdaq, are its financial reports from the SEC considered a reliable source? Kevinmanji (talk) 03:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply