Keverich2
Keverich2, you are invited to the Teahouse edit
|
Hi Keverich2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Notice edit
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Because of this [1]. Volunteer Marek 20:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
September 2014 edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 07:31, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Keverich2 reported by User:Darkness Shines (Result: ). Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 07:43, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
September 2014 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. the panda ₯’ 11:57, 13 September 2014 (UTC)- Note to admins: this editor has evaded their block twice already, and an SPI is now active. Still, I have not extended this original block for evasion. If Keverich2 does evade the block even once more, feel free to extend this block to 30 days or more. I have also been forced to add page protection to 2 of their recent articles. See my talkpage for the most recent advice I gave to their block-evading sock the panda ₯’ 11:41, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
July 2015 edit
Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Russia seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:40, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Talk:Russia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:59, 5 July 2015 (UTC)