Kesadilla22
- A new user finding Jimbo Wales' page with their very first edit? That makes it obvious that you were canvassed here from facebook or some other noticeboard, which violates Wikipedia's meatpuppet policy. You have been blocked. Bishonen | talk 16:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC).
February 2016 edit
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bishonen | talk 16:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC) |
Kesadilla22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not anyone other than myself. My opinions are entirely my own. So blocking me was an arbitrary and abusive act by the administrator. And the block should be removed. It is disillusioning that Wikipedia appears to feel threatened by a call for disagreements about its articles to be resolved by logic, reason, and the documented facts of the matter. Kesadilla22 (talk) 13:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
We aren't idiots. (Well, sometimes we are, but not in this particular case). Floquenbeam (talk) 14:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.