Kenologica
a. Providence, b. providership, and c. prosperity edit
- Theos =
- Demos =
- Heiros =
-Kenologica (talk) 16:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Arguments edit
- logical und slow
- logical und fast
- illogical und fast
- illogical und slow
Working -Kenologica (talk) 16:08, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
November 2015 edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gunther von Hagens. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dr. K. 04:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Military. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dr. K. 05:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jesse Ventura may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [[totalitarian]] control of [[The Internet]] and the global [[banking]]-[[currency]] systems, cf. ([[net neutrality]], has been called "'''Jessemandering'''" (cf. "Fort Rules" x-box redact.seven.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
islam edit
do you have privelege of editing the subject islam , i just want to edit the purpose because its not only to worship the primary purpose is to serve humanity , i can give refrences for confirmation. Jazib khan 001 (talk) 02:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2015 edit
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Huon (talk) 22:05, 27 November 2015 (UTC) |
Kenologica (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Honor-less blocking due to "aristocratic counsel" (anti-freedom) having excessive krypto-, klepto- and krepto- maniac governance of Wikimedia and its subprojects, on into the free open source works world, and into industry, and the way surveillance operates, for example see my edit to the NSA vs. Wikimedia case. Also, the process by which the block was delivered out-of-the-blue was mala-forma. Communication with long-time non-troll editors is required. Note the cowardice also in talking openly about aristo-gratis trolling, such as by long time lurker Charles of Buckminster, Wallies.
Decline reason:
You do not address the reason for your block, which is evasion of your existing block. Please request an unblock from your original account.-gadfium 06:06, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|I am Stevertigo, seeking relief from a very quick and unsubstantiated block o my main account (I dont use socks anyway). Please indicate alternate *forum for communication. stevencooney@yahoo.com, alt. owl@spaz.org}}