Kenny139
November 2019
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Star Wars: The Last Jedi. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 07:48, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars: The Last Jedi. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 15:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Star Wars: The Last Jedi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toa Nidhiki05 15:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kenny139 reported by User:The Mirror Cracked (Result: ). Thank you. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 15:45, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
I would love to see what an administrator says as I proved my citation is correct, meanwhile the citation you keep reverting to has been proven to be fake. I just want to make the Last Jedi page more accurate, please keep your feelings out of it.Kenny139 (talk) 16:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
November 2019
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Kenny139 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I made an edit to a page that had an unproven article listed as a citation. I was not edit warring, I am the victim of it. The citation I posted was proven correct, making the article far more accurate than it currently is. The issue in question is that the film was review bombed. There is no evidence of this, furthermore the VP of Communicators of Fandango, the parent company of Rotten Tomatoes said that "several teams of security, network, and social database experts constantly monitor reviews and ratings to ensure that they are genuine."[1]Kenny139 (talk) 16:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Only you can control your own behavior; if others are edit warring against you, there are proper ways to address it that do not involve edit warring in return. Being correct is not a defense to edit warring. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Kenny139 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
so a wikipedia admin is telling me that making correct edits is not a reason to get unblocked? Kenny139 (talk) 20:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
A Wikipedia admin (actually, multiple Wikipedia admins) are telling you that you were blocked for edit warring, and that you will need to address the edit warring if you would like to be unblocked. Every editor involved in an edit war believes they are in the "right", which is why we have policies in place to ensure that the reverts don't go on in perpetuity. When the block expires, take your concerns to the article talk page.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:07, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have opened an investigation into your account at SPI. Toa Nidhiki05 21:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Please don't abuse multiple accounts
edit
Hello, Kenny139, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Leonard133 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.