Kemarimnds

Argon compounds

Hi Kemarimnds,

Welcome to Wikipedia. And to chemistry pages in particular. I wonder where you are getting names like "Triargodiargentogold(I)" from. Do you have a reference to support those link names you are adding in argon compounds? Also since the ions are not notable, there may be no point in linking them. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

to be honest, I was bored, BUT there could be a possibility that those pages could exist, due to them being made and synthesised in the real world, and there is enough information on see of them, so I don't see why not. Sorry if I sound condescending, but honestly this was with all intent of trying to make placeholders if anybody does redeem those links. All good. Kemarimnds (talk) 12:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I could rename Triargodiargentogold(I) to something more suitable and respectful to the IUPAC nomenclature rules Kemarimnds (talk) 12:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Hydronium, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:40, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hydrocarboxyl, you may be blocked from editing. You added uncited info (this is your third warning for this behavior) and also an incorrect radical electron-dot. DMacks (talk) 18:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Diazynediium has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Diazynediium. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 18:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

whats this one about Kemarimnds (talk) 22:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Nearly every single one of your edits. DMacks (talk) 04:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

understandable, sorry. by the way, concerning diazynediium, would it be more suitable to state that it is indeed a hypothetical compound, or due to the lack of references it be unpublished. the main objective of this page was to extense knowledge of nitrogen hydrides, despite lack of references.

Let me know please Kemarimnds (talk) 13:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Published hypothetical things and even published things that have been disproved as nonsense or hoax are fine. "Lack of published references" is a fatal flaw for a Wikipedia article. WP is not for developing new theories. See WP:GNG:

A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

DMacks (talk) 16:13, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diazynediium (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Graeme Bartlett was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diazynediium and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Kemarimnds! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 03:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)