Proposed deletion of Mad father(狂父) edit

Hello, Kelvincheung1221990. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mad father(狂父), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Crystallized C (talk) 16:54, 26 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

November 2015 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mad father(狂父). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. This edit where you restored the game strategy and walkthrough, is clearly contrary to Wikipedia's policy WP:GAMETRIVIA. Please do not continue to disrupt the article like this. Gronk Oz (talk) 05:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Mad father(狂父). Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. As a very new editor, you may not be aware of Wikipedia's policies against "edit wars". If you believe there is a place for the detailed walk-through of this game, then what you need to do is to discuss it, and explain why. Put your case on the article's Talk page; do not just continue to put back material that is contrary to Wikipedia's guidelines. Gronk Oz (talk) 11:00, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply