January 2016

edit

  Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! ... discospinster talk 16:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Narutolovehinata5. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sakura Kinomoto without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
 
A cup of warm tea to welcome you!

Hello, Kcorilol, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to continue. Some useful pages to visit are:

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! 7&6=thirteen () 7&6=thirteen () 21:07, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Superfood
added links pointing to Orange, Lime and Black bean

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional undectets has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Fictional undectets, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 04:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vega (Street Fighter) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Category:Fictional Ninjutsu practitioners

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:42, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Avatar: The Last Airbender characters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Absolutist and Revisionist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Star Wars characters

edit

I understand what you were trying to do with Category:Star Wars Canon characters, but this is not a valid category. Any character you could designate as "canon" could have been used in both canon and non-canon works. Plus, "Star Wars Canon" is not a "thing" the way Star Wars Legends is a branded concept. Legends-specific characters can be tagged by Category:Star Wars Legends characters, which is a subcategory of Category:Star Wars characters, but every character that has been used in a canon work or both should remain in Category:Star Wars characters.— TAnthonyTalk 16:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have also eliminated your Category:Star Wars Canon. Again, the categories you had made subordinate to it included items not from canon works. The canonocity of Star Wars topics is unfortunately too complex to be accommodated by a category system. The bulk of articles and topics should remain under Category:Star Wars and its subcategories. If you see a specific need for defining canon vs Legends somewhere, let me know and perhaps I can help you come up with a list or another appropriate way to clarify this. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 18:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Don't add those self-made maps

edit

Don't add those self-made UNSD maps to every article. They're completely taken out of context and are inferior to officially published UN maps. - LouisAragon (talk) 21:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ghostbusters (franchise) into List of Ghostbusters characters. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Season of the Force

edit
 

The article Season of the Force has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to have any encyclopedic value.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 18:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Alien navbox

edit

As a preface, let me say that I appreciate your contribution to the navbox overall; I really do. However, I had to remove the crossover films from there, as the AVP navbox covers those materials and the most responsible thing for the Alien navbox is to give a nod, but not to include anything more than a link to the franchise media. Once again, great job overall! DARTHBOTTO talkcont 22:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional infertile and sterilized people has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Fictional infertile and sterilized people, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Editor2020, Talk 22:06, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rachael MacFarlane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Batmobile
added links pointing to Tumbler and Dennis McCarthy
Harem (genre)
added a link pointing to Yuri

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Fictional martial artists categories

edit

Please undo all changes you have made. Firstly, the new categories are WP:OVERCAT, as an intersection of media and character property is too specific. Secondly, it's inappropriate, as many characters are in multiple media. Ash Williams, for example, has been in film, television, video games, and comics. To place the article in all four would bloat and devalue the category structure. That's why those categories didn't exist in the first place, because of long standing consensus regarding categories. Please read all category guidelines, and look through the history of WP:CFD to familiarize yourself on what is a proper category. The ones you've been making are inapproriate. And I won't even get into the poor names for them you've foisted upon us. If you don't upmerge the articles back into the main category, I will likely take the categories to CFD, where the result will likely be the same anyway. oknazevad (talk) 15:45, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Kcorilol. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional jinyiwei has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Fictional jinyiwei, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 02:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional MSS agents has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Fictional MSS agents, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 02:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional victims of bullies has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Fictional victims of bullies has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 16:18, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional females by occupation has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Fictional females by occupation has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CensoredScribe, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

gnu57 10:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Google Doodles has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Google Doodles has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Category:Powered exoskeletons in fiction has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Powered exoskeletons in fiction has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:55, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional Shōrin-ryū practitioners has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Fictional Shōrin-ryū practitioners has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 07:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional Lerdrit practitioners has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Fictional Lerdrit practitioners has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 07:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional kalaripayattu practitioners has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Fictional kalaripayattu practitioners has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 07:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional Zi Ran Men practitioners

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional Zi Ran Men practitioners indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional Mi Tzu practitioners

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional Mi Tzu practitioners indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional Fanzi practitioners

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional Fanzi practitioners indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional Vale Tudo practitioners

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional Vale Tudo practitioners indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional Hei Hu Quan practitioners

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional Hei Hu Quan practitioners indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:39, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Parody television series based on Star Wars has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Parody television series based on Star Wars has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 16:05, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional Chinese people by ethnic or national origin has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Fictional Chinese people by ethnic or national origin has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional practitioners of martial arts weapons has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Fictional practitioners of martial arts weapons has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional hybrid martial artists has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Fictional hybrid martial artists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional Chinese people by ethnicity has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Fictional Chinese people by ethnicity has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional Fu Jow Pai practitioners

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional Fu Jow Pai practitioners indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 15 § Category:Fictional spies by nationality on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 20:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply