September 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Prism (Katy Perry album) that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Prism (Katy Perry album). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 07:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Prism (Katy Perry album). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:01, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Prism (Katy Perry album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Prism (Katy Perry album) was changed by Kcarlson1999 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882629 on 2013-09-15T19:22:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Prism (Katy Perry album) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:37, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply