KazooOfTheNorth
Welcome!
Hello, KazooOfTheNorth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Smart Distributed System, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:22, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Smart Distributed System edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Smart Distributed System requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:22, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
A better approach edit
The article Smart Distributed System has zero references, and no indication that it is a notable company. In the early days of Wikipedia, it was not uncommon to start with limited material, and add notability over a short period of time, but norms have changed, and articles failing to meet minimum standards are not permitted. As an alternative. you could work on an article in user space, for example, User:KazooOfTheNorth/Smart Distributed System, where you could add reliable sources without editors looking to delete the article immediately.--SPhilbrickT 18:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- I saw your note on the talk page that you hoped someone else would develop this "stub". It was not a stub. Even stubs require evidence of notability. I hope you will try again (in user space) but if you were unable to find anything, it may be a challenge.--SPhilbrickT 18:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Responding to your question at my talk page edit
Your article wasn't about Honeywell, which is notable and has its own article. It was about some technology you claim is promoted by Honeywell. You provided no indication the technology meets Notability requirements, and no references to reliable sources. Adding a link to Honeywell doesn't help, as notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. --SPhilbrickT 17:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Where and what are you looking at to show you that WP not inherited stuff? How is a product formerly made by Honeywell not about Honeywell? Didn't that other link indicate that Honeywell did make it? --KazooOfTheNorth (talk) 19:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- A product made by Honeywell is not automatically notable. We don't have an article about every single product for sale. The products themselves have to be notable, and not inherently notable because they are made by a notable company. I didn't follow the link. Links are to support claims you make. (You asked what I was looking at; do you understand that a blue link such as this is a link to more information?)--SPhilbrickT 21:26, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I was imprecise in asking "what are you looking at?" I am trying to follow your meaning in what I should have done to imply that because this is a product made by Honeywell, I should have done thus and so to denote inherited notability. Isn't it rather arbitrary to say something to the effect of, "just because a large controls company made this control to control automation in the world, it's not notable"? It just so happens that at one time, this was a rather popular form of Fieldbus protocol. A large portion of distribution center automation uses this, including that in the USPS. Honeywell would like to forget it, but there remains significant 3rd party support. I'm not at all saying this is what's happening, but suppressing any mention of SDS is likely what Honeywell PR would like, as they don't make any money off of the old stuff. I might correct or update my original post if I had any idea how to get to it (my problem, not yours). I know you're trying to uphold some sort of stub standard, but for the life of me, I can't see what standard of "notability" exists beyond pure capriciousness. KazooOfTheNorth (talk) 21:49, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry if I was unclear. I'll try again. I told you that Smart Distributed System needs to pass notability requirements, and your response was "Honeywell IS a notable company". It sounds like you are asserting that if Smart Distributed System is made by a notable company, it must be notable. That concept is called "inherited notability" on Wikipedia, but the point is that notability is NOT inherited. You can add a link to Honeywell if it adds to the article, but it doesn't help with notability. You need to reference multiple secondary reliable sources with substantive discussion. For example, find a newspaper article talking about the product, and not just mentioning it in passing. --SPhilbrickT 23:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I was imprecise in asking "what are you looking at?" I am trying to follow your meaning in what I should have done to imply that because this is a product made by Honeywell, I should have done thus and so to denote inherited notability. Isn't it rather arbitrary to say something to the effect of, "just because a large controls company made this control to control automation in the world, it's not notable"? It just so happens that at one time, this was a rather popular form of Fieldbus protocol. A large portion of distribution center automation uses this, including that in the USPS. Honeywell would like to forget it, but there remains significant 3rd party support. I'm not at all saying this is what's happening, but suppressing any mention of SDS is likely what Honeywell PR would like, as they don't make any money off of the old stuff. I might correct or update my original post if I had any idea how to get to it (my problem, not yours). I know you're trying to uphold some sort of stub standard, but for the life of me, I can't see what standard of "notability" exists beyond pure capriciousness. KazooOfTheNorth (talk) 21:49, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- A product made by Honeywell is not automatically notable. We don't have an article about every single product for sale. The products themselves have to be notable, and not inherently notable because they are made by a notable company. I didn't follow the link. Links are to support claims you make. (You asked what I was looking at; do you understand that a blue link such as this is a link to more information?)--SPhilbrickT 21:26, 30 November 2010 (UTC)