Kathychang
A tag has been placed on Bing Thom Architects, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Bing Thom Architects and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 01:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: Deletion of Bing Thom Architects Article edit
True, but the article didn't specify why the subject is notable, which is why it was deleted. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone
- As important as the subject may be, the article itself has to say why it's notable. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, if you have found sufficient reliable sources to establish notability, then you can recreate the article. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)