User talk:Kateshortforbob/Archives2010/November
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Okay this coincidence has to be enjoyed
Hello Kateshortforbob. I noticed your post at ANI. The coincidence of your user name and the user name of the editor being discussed was too fun to not be commented on. If we could just get an editor named Rumpie involved then the joke would be complete. I know that the subject matter was actually serious and it is a shame that the editor in question has reached this point. But the odds of this BlackAdder connection taking place did make me smile and I just had to share that smile with you :-). Cheers and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 16:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oh dear, I didn't even notice that when writing - time to get out my Complete Blackadder scripts again! You did give me a laugh by pointing it out though :-) Thanks --Kateshortforbob talk 15:37, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Glad you enjoyed my note. FYI a new discussion over the editor started here Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Pumpie.27s talk page. While there may not be anything that you will want to add over your previous post I thought that I would make you aware of this just in case. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 19:55, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. I will be interested to see how things work out for Pumpie in the long run. --Kateshortforbob talk 13:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
- Glad you enjoyed my note. FYI a new discussion over the editor started here Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Pumpie.27s talk page. While there may not be anything that you will want to add over your previous post I thought that I would make you aware of this just in case. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 19:55, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Issue on copyright infrigment at Rgimenez/Prosimos
Dear Kateshortforbob, I do not understand and I can not see the unambiguous copyright infringement of CSD-G12 in Prosimos article. I would be delighted it you could explain it to me. In following lines I pretend to give reasons enough to support my stance. Prosimos article is about a R&D Project that has been funded by European Commission. In order to write it I have follow several examples under European Projects Category and I have made it look like exactly the same. It is not advertising since these projects are public funded and to be of high public interest. The article also contains a link to the project webpage www.prosimos.eu where the righfulness of the project can be found. Moreover I am technical manager of the project and entailed by the rest of the Consortium to write the article. It has also been review by the other partners taking part in the project. Hoping to hear from you soon, Kind Regards,
RGimenezRGimenez (talk) 11:05, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- I have made comments relevant to this at User talk:RGimenez. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:13, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks - I've added my 2p. --Kateshortforbob talk 14:18, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the revdel, can I ask how you came across this? Mechanical digger (talk) 13:01, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oh - I was just about to leave a message for the editors I revdel'd, including yourself! I browse recent contributions from new editors sometimes and came across a message left on the article talk page by new editor User:GarethRDRwiki. I don't use revdel too often, but this seemed like an ideal case for it. --Kateshortforbob talk 13:05, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, ok, many hands make light work, thanks! Mechanical digger (talk) 13:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC)