Welcome!

edit

Hello, Katefaxen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 14:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences (September 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 14:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Katefaxen, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 14:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences (September 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 21:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences (October 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 00:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences (October 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 18:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences (November 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 19:06, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 18:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

edit

  Hello, Katefaxen! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 18:07, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences (January 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— kikichugirl oh hello! 01:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences (January 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CatcherStorm was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CatcherStorm talk 22:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Some comments

edit

I had a look at your draft: UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, and wondered whether you had found the review process somewhat disheartening. I had a look at it and removed one sentence, but also noticed that you use other wikipedia pages as references. I am afraid this does not work. In fact Wikipedia maintains very similar standards to academia about citing sources, and this means that Wikipedia is not acceptable. This is because erroneous information could be introduced and maintained through circular referencing. Wikipedia functions as medium which links original research and reliable sources together, without ever including original research or claiming to be a reliable source in itself: rather it is means of finding the reliable sources on differing facts: in this sense it can be seen as an implementation of some of the ideas of Otto Neurath (International Encyclopedia of Unified Science) or Ludwig Fleck (The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact). When I get a chance I hope to be able to change some of the references.Leutha (talk) 13:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences has been accepted

edit
 
UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LoudLizard (talk) 20:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply