User talk:Karada/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Removal of Squitti's ?

I am sure you are a person for equality.

If on the one hand we allow links like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sterling_Jewelers_Inc.

Then why not allow Squitti's ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Firstly, the Sterling Jewelers Inc. article contains a strong assertion of notability: "Sterling has the #2 position in the US with a 4.2% market share of all jewelry purchases (compared to Wal-Mart at 4.6%, a substantial amount of that being costume jewelry, which Sterling does not sell)." Secondly, its existence and notability can be easily confirmed from independent sources: it is listed in major company directories [1], and the subject of news stories [2].

Now compare Squitti's: it's a two-store chain, Googling fails to find any independent web-based source that refers to it, and [3] finds no hits at all from any news source. -- Karada 10:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Squitti's claim to fame, is that it claims to be the smallest specialized department store in the world, together with funding social research over the past 20 years, (ie Microsoft-Bill Gates) into the discovery of anti-truths, ie half-truths#2-6. that suggests this is the original sin from Biblical fame.

Bigger is not better...?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 12:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

I can see that you are acting in good faith with your article submissions, and that running into the various Wikipedia policies is frustrating you. Unfortunately, the first claim to fame is nowhere supported by any evidence from reliable sources, which is the main criterion for notability, and the last part of your claim (the discovery "anti-truths") falls under Wikipedia's no original research policy, which forbids using Wikipedia to promote your own original research. For a good guide to Wikipedia's policies, you might want to read Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset. -- Karada 13:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

As for-profit and non-profits go, the point was not the discovery of anti-truths, confirmed in material from Oxford University Press circa 1994, and on the site www.thejesuschristcode.com, the point was that Squitti's supported research into this and other discoveries. Yes original research, but the fact is the issue that was noted.

Wikipedia, is not frustrating me, it is only a matter of time, before the word about anti-truths reaches the masses, the issue is equality and fairness to Squitti's relative to others.

Oh and by the way, I did not hide under a puppet handle, or get another non-squitti name to input the information, as some are and have done....

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 23:11, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately, www.thejesuschristcode.com does not appear to be usable as an independent source, since the whois information for that domain shows that you (or someone with the same name as you, with an address the same as the business address given by Google Maps for "Squitti's") are the administrator of that domain. -- Karada 23:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, I did not say it was an independant source, merely a source.

Here is another.

Lakehead Univeristy Class Notes

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 14:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Old SALT vs New SALT

This is mostly an FYI to you as an admin who still uses the old, templated method for salting pages. That method of salting pages is depricated, and the template is now up for deletion. While things can still change, the current discussion definitely looks headed towards deletion. Assuming that this happens, you will no longer be able to salt pages with the old method, and will need to begin using the newer salting method that involves cascading protection on the title, and allows recreation to be blocked while still having no article at the name, leaving it as a red link. This new method of salting is centered at WP:PT, and the instructions for how to make it work are there as well. - TexasAndroid 13:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Michelle Merkin POTD

In view of your many contributions to the Glamour photography article that includes Image:Michele Merkin 1.jpg, you may wish to participate in the discussion on Image:Michele Merkin 1.jpg at the admin noticeboard. -- Jreferee t/c 21:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Valetudinarian

Hey, I removed the transwiki label on the article "Valetudinarian". Apparently, a similar article does exist already in wikidictionary (oops, I didn't know that until I looked this morning). If you feel the wikipedia article should simply be deleted, or redirected from the wikipedia page to the wikidictionary page instead, that's cool. Mindraker 11:56, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

PS I had to undo the active link to bukkake.com because wikipedia was giving me some annoying error. Sorry about that. Mindraker 11:58, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. -- Karada 12:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Sadism_and_masochism#Major_editing_is_necessary

Hi Karada, I've seen that you have been working a lot on articles in this field. Since I'm no native speaker, it would great if you could give this discussion a glance.

I'm really sorry to say, but the articles in this field really are in need for a propper structure, allowing further substantial growth. At the moment there are some major mix ups. Please don't get me wrong, I don't want to be a know-it-all, but being a Member of de WikiProject Sexology and sexuality and main author of :de-featured de:BDSM i've been working in this field for quite a while. ;-)

It would be great if we could fix the differentiation in this field (Sadism, Masochism and Sadomasochism) on :en as it is done on practically all other language versions of Wikipedia (e.g. es:BDSM(feat.), de:BDSM(feat.), it:BDSM, sv:BDSM or pt:BDSM) and on most scientific sources.

Kind Regards.--Nemissimo (talk) 12:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

That sounds like a good idea to me. I've moved the Sadism and Masochism article to Sadomasochism, as a start. Please let me know if you need any help doing this. -- Karada (talk) 12:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Great. Thanks a lot. This was an important first step.--Nemissimo (talk) 13:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

BDSM reloaded

I added further sources and rearranged the images. I'm afraid I won't be able to add significantly more references. If you have any further good sources at hand it would be highly appreciated. ;-) Kind regards.--Nemissimo (talk) 14:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

• Hi Karada, I just realized that you were one of the very first registered users working on the article. I really don't want to bother you, since I know myself from :de how time consuming admin activities can be, but maybe you can give me some clue if there are any users who have literature on the subject. I need some further english sources, since I'm kind of running out of english books on the topic. ;-) Regards. --Nemissimo 19:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of prostitution-related jargon

I have nominated List of prostitution-related jargon, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of prostitution-related jargon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 12:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Lissa Noble

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Lissa Noble, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

CHUDWAH

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article CHUDWAH, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Klaatu barada nikto

Why have you redirected Klaatu barada nikto to Klaatu barata niktu? The correct spelling is Klaatu barada nikto (26,500 google hits), not 'Klaatu barata niktu (436 google hits). Also see [4], [5] --Viriditas | Talk 12:42, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks for pointing that out. -- Karada 12:48, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

i think its by the way it is pronounced Niktu! tu! not to = tow —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.97.164.105 (talk) 00:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

All edits?

Did you mean to rollback all of your edits here? Lawrence § t/e 18:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, for somewhat obscure reasons. -- Karada (talk) 18:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem, just wasn't sure if it was an error or not. Cheers. Lawrence § t/e 18:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Kali's teeth bracelet

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kali's teeth bracelet, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Kali's teeth bracelet. Neitherday (talk) 02:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kali's teeth bracelet

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kali's teeth bracelet, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kali's teeth bracelet. Thank you. Neitherday (talk) 06:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Nicola Squitti deletion.

Given that Nicola Squitti was a Senator in Italy, one of few that was so decorated, I ask you to reverse the deletion.

There was alot of information on the site, that you deleted, seems more political than other ? Please explain.

You site that the only link was a dead link. I am certain that someone can spend time to find what happened to the original link. You had a reason, but was it that valid to erase the history of one of the most decorated people in southern Italy ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 02:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Without any verifiable sources, and with no immediately obvious independent reliable sources, the article fails to meet the criteria of Wikipedia's attribution policy. It would help greatly if you could provide some kind of verifiable citation to back up the information in the article. A Google search for "Nicola Squitti" finds only Wikipedia pages, which cannot be used as a source for Wikipedia articles, and your own website. Neither of the two citations you gave for this article were verifiable: one was to "Nobility of Italy, The Mormon Library(The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints)- UTAH", which is not specific enough to identify any particular book, and the other was a broken Lotus Notes link [6]. -- Karada 08:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

The Title of the book as found by Roy Piovesana was called "Nobility of Italy", here is the link

Italian Senate

Thanks for your time.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 12:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Would you please reinstate the article on Senator Nicola Squitti Here is the link.

Senate of Italy

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 14:45, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

There is also a book 'The Falcon and the Eagle" that sites sources.

The Falcon and the Eagle

apollonius P

I did check and it seems to be the same, based on a google search for the term. "Apollonius pursuit problem" is mentioned on only 27 different pages [7]. "Problem of Apollonius" is about a ship in pursuit of another, which would suggest that this is a synonym of "apollonius pursuit problem", which is about how a ship can best go in pursuit of another to catch it and if that is possible, and to answer this problem in each case, and is written by Apollonius, which would strongly imply they are the same. "Problem of apollonius" is mentioned 144 distinct times, and 8280 times overall. [8] If you can use the 27 references for "Apollonius pursuit problem" to create that article and demonstrate that they are different, I strongly encourage you to do so- fire away! But as you can see I have looked, you can't say I haven't.:) special, random, Merkinsmum 12:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

If you look at the 'see also' at the bottom of this paragraph, [9] you can see that it seems to be listed as a synonym of it- "apollonius' problem" i.e. "the problem of Apollonius." The circles are how he calculates if the ship can be caught and the best method of doing so, (which is a method/story used to demonstrate the problem, perhaps) rather than an end in themselves.special, random, Merkinsmum 12:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ejaz Fiaz

I have nominated Ejaz Fiaz, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ejaz Fiaz (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dhartung | Talk 03:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Model in muzzle gag.jpg

Hi, I'm trying to move all the sex toy images to the Commons. You don't actually say wjo created the above image and so who can license it. You do say it's cropped from a GFDL image, which is fine, but you have to say if it is yourself who made the image. --Simon Speed (talk) 19:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

It's now in the latest version of the article summary at Image:Model in muzzle gag.jpg -- Karada (talk) 23:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for doing that so quickly, I've now moved the photo to the Commons and flagged it as such. --Simon Speed (talk) 07:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Hype

I have nominated Hype (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Goochelaar (talk) 13:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Category:Salt pans

I have nominated category:Salt pans for merger into category:Salt flats. As the editor who created the category, you may wish to comment at the discussion.

I would have emailed you to draw this to your attention, but you have not enabled this feature in your preferences. - Fayenatic (talk) 17:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Survey request

Hi,
I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted, because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions.

Thank You, Sam4bc (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Asymmetric bondage

An article that you have been involved in editing, Asymmetric bondage, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asymmetric bondage. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? WJBscribe (talk) 09:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lorelei (bondage model)

I have nominated Lorelei (bondage model), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorelei (bondage model). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Axillary intercourse

I have nominated Axillary intercourse, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axillary intercourse. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. rootology (C)(T) 04:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Simone Devon

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Simone Devon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RMHED (talk) 20:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Francis E. Dec

I have nominated Francis E. Dec, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis E. Dec. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Pcap ping 06:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Acault

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Acault, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

1-sentence stub from 2006 which has been transwikied to Wiktionary. Prodding (per optional instructions in Transwiki notice) unless someone wishes to salvage it.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Outsider80 (talk) 18:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

homosexual transsexual

Hi, I'm GA reviewing homosexual transsexual. Greetings Wandalstouring (talk) 19:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ashley Renee

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ashley Renee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable pornographic actress. See WP:PORNBIO.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:37, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ashley Renee

I have nominated Ashley Renee, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Renee. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:11, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Harry Benjamin Syndrome

An article that you have been involved in editing, Harry Benjamin Syndrome, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Benjamin Syndrome. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hfarmer (talk) 15:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view

There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view, about the section WP:MORALIZE. Could you look at this? --William S. Saturn (talk) 23:12, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism Claim

Can I ask why you issued a warning against me for my editing of the Gary Glitter article? I was particular concerned as this was a 'last warning'. I would like to point out that there were no earlier warnings and that you made the incorrect assumption that this was deliberate vandalism rather than an attempt to edit an article to improve its accuracy. Whether you agree with my edit or not is not really the point, the point is that you did not contact me and find out the reasoning for my edit, rather you assumed it was malicious. Can I remind you that according to Wikipedia "vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taranita (talk • contribs) 11:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

"Last warning" in this context means "do this again, and you will be blocked from editing". Your edit to that article seems to have made two distinct types of changes to the article: firstly, it removed the article from the category "British Buddhists", and secondly, it removed some, but not all, digit strings from dozens of places in the article, rendering unusable most of the references provided as part of the article. Unless the latter edits were intentional, I'm at a loss to see how the second set of changes could have happened by accident: if you can, could you please enlighten me as to how it might have happened? -- Karada (talk) 17:15, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Having looked at the edit, I can see what you mean. My intention was to remove the article from the list of British Buddhists. I have no idea how the other changes came about. I can assure you I have no knowledge of either deliberate or accidental vandalism. Taranita (talk) 12:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation: I accept your assurance that your edit was in good faith, and I've now removed the warning from your talk page. It's possible that you might have been bacuase some kind of "personal firewall" software on your computer attempted to remove numeric strings from the post in an attempt to protect your personal data. If so, it is likely to make similar changes in future. -- Karada (talk) 14:08, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Gerbilling

I have nominated Gerbilling, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerbilling (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Stifle (talk) 20:13, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Ashley Renee

I have nominated Ashley Renee, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Renee (3rd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:43, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Christina Abernathy

The article Christina Abernathy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Author who fails all of the criteria at WP:AUTHOR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin (talk) 00:03, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Karada! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 901 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Holly Golightly - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Jacklyn Lick - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Jilly Johnson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Nicole Farhi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Christina Abernathy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Mélanie Muller - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Biddu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jilly Johnson

The article Jilly Johnson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, partially negative biography of a living person. Please do not remove this prod tag without sourcing the article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 06:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mélanie Muller

The article Mélanie Muller has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP; no evidence that this person meets WP:AUTHOR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 06:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bondage Photographer

The article Bondage Photographer has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhomb (talk) 07:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Scene (BDSM)

I have nominated Scene (BDSM), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scene (BDSM). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Stillwaterising (talk) 14:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Subspace (BDSM)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Subspace (BDSM). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subspace (BDSM). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Animal transformation fantasy

I have nominated Animal transformation fantasy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal transformation fantasy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Stillwaterising (talk) 12:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Tori Sinclair

I have nominated Tori Sinclair, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tori Sinclair. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. EuroPride (talk) 08:27, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Autosadism

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Autosadism. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autosadism. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hadaka apron

The article Hadaka apron has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable concept, dictionary definition only, unreferenced for over 3 years

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 19:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Sdfgdsgdfhgdfhbfghgfh

Sdfgdsgdfhgdfhbfghgfh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - you put a block notice on this user's talk page, but didn't actually apply the block! I assume you just forgot. Anyway I've now blocked (before I noticed your template actually). Peter 14:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Medical model of disability

An article that you have been involved in editing, Medical model of disability , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Tcp-ip (talk) 01:10, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Bondage cuffs for deletion

The article Bondage cuffs is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bondage cuffs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Merrill Stubing (talk) 07:33, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Gynecology

Category:Gynecology, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative

Hi Karada,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Human skills

Category:Human skills, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. LeSnail (talk) 23:35, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 18 certificate

The article 18 certificate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOCITE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 08:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Contract (BDSM)

The article Contract (BDSM) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is nothing more than a bunch of OR whose sources aren't reliable. There may well be a contract in such relationships, but it does not appear to have such standing that it's worthy of an encyclopedic article. This all seems to be part of a walled garden in which a ton of these BDSM articles are living a rather non-flourishing existence.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 22:29, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Contract (BDSM) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Contract (BDSM) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contract (BDSM) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 02:51, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 06:32, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 10:19, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Francis E. Dec for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Francis E. Dec is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis E. Dec (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LuckyLouie (talk) 22:14, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Like Minded Group

Template:Like Minded Group has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lfdder (talk) 11:54, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Bisexuality_in_the_Arab_world

I just nominated this article for deletion. It's unreferenced since Dec 2008 and contains very little factual information, apart from some generalisations about bisexuality and the current state of sodomy laws. I'd live to have it back with some factual, referenced content. Thank you for your work! --Cvalda (talk) 16:23, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of His Divine Shadow for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article His Divine Shadow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/His Divine Shadow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Subspace (BDSM) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Subspace (BDSM) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subspace (BDSM) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DreamGuy (talk) 03:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Principle of good enough

The article Principle of good enough has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 89.204.137.153 (talk) 00:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Douche bag

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Douche bag requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. J Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) ^talk 10:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Japanese bondage models for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Japanese bondage models is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Japanese bondage models until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pbp 22:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of bondage models by decade

The article List of bondage models by decade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a single source to indicate that being a bondage model is notable, nor to note that anybody on this list is noted for being one.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. pbp 04:31, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of List of bondage models by decade for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of bondage models by decade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bondage models by decade until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pbp 17:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Bisexuality in the Arab world for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bisexuality in the Arab world is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bisexuality in the Arab world (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Zumoarirodoka ^(talk) 20:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Human bites listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Human bites. Since you had some involvement with the Human bites redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)