Kapil shanmukh

Welcome!

Hello, Kapil shanmukh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Tanuku have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  Vin09 (talk) 16:16, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Tanuku. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 04:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Tanuku. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 07:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Tanuku. Vin09 (talk) 08:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Bhimavaram, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vin09 (talk) 08:53, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tanuku has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tanuku was changed by Kapil shanmukh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902014 on 2016-11-09T13:39:58+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:39, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tanuku. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Tanuku

It is not a city, but a town per census of India 2011. Please check the sources before adding.--Vin09 (talk) 05:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Tanuku. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  —SpacemanSpiff 07:36, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

• It appears that you have no interest in editing collaboratively. If you continue this behavior then you will be blocked indefinitely. —SpacemanSpiff 01:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  —SpacemanSpiff 11:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)