Kalamikid, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Kalamikid! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)


edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second Morgan government, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello

edit

Hello 2A02:C7F:8B04:9A00:BCAC:8D7B:573F:AF52 (talk) 19:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

March 2022

edit

  Thanks for contributing to the article Cardiff Royal Infirmary. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 12:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Dame Jill Knight, 1990.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Dame Jill Knight, 1990.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Honorifics in article

edit

Dear editor, I write to draw your attention to MOS:HONORIFIC, which generally discourages using honorifics in the running text of articles. This evening I came across your valued edits in May to Norman Baker, which read: Baker attended the Accession Council and Principal Proclamation for His Majesty King Charles III at St James's Palace, London and signed the Official Proclamation and witnessed His Majesty's Oath. Per MOS:HONORIFIC, and to remove unnecessary details for the article's purposes on the proceedings (which are included in the linked article but not in the cited source), I have shortened this paragraph to: ...attended the Accession Council for the Proclamation of King Charles III at St James's Palace, London. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 19:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Charles III requested move discussion

edit

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nia Griffith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fay Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Removed your edit (kind of)

edit

Hi Kalamikid, I removed your recent edit to Mother of the House and updated the table because your edit made a valid point. The date of eligibility is a bit dubious and referencing it properly I don't think will be possible. Based on your edit, I've made a change to the heading of the table and added an explanatory note.

Just wanted to stop by to say thank you for the edit and let you know how I addressed it. Hope that's okay!

Happy editting! Jo Jc JoTalk💬Edits📝 13:37, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Personally I'd delete the whole article, but I don't think that would go down well.
FFIW, Harman referred to herself as Mother in the opening remarks straight after the 2015 election. It might be that prior to 2015 Harman herself, whilst being 'the mother' hadn't realised. Kalamikid (talk) 14:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply