Here's a belated welcome! I hope you're enjoying yourself. -- Stephen Gilbert 17:27 Feb 22, 2003 (UTC)

Thanks Stephen - this has turned out to be a new dawn for me in looking at new technologies. I've started looking at the whole wiki culture and am thinking of installing it on the Company's intranet. Thanks again Kabads
== Computer / Video games ==

Hi Kabads - in the past you've worked on the Computer game and Video game pages - if you're still interested, I'm looking at drafting a reorganisation at Talk:Computer game/Computer and video games. Take a look, and edit or comment! Mark Richards 18:10, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)


Hi Kabads - using your user page, your web site and friendsreunited, I think I've managed to work out who you are. If I'm correct, I was in the same year as you at the Hurst. Nice to hear from you - hope life's been treating you well since 1985! (message copied from my talk page, just in case you aren't watching it) --Lancevortex 10:47, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Cinerama

edit

I moves Cinerama (band) to its own page, in case you want to make some links to it. (I don't know anything about them.) Mike Mackerm 18:23, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know Mike. I'll put a new watch on it. Kabads 12:39, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)

William James

edit

I'd like to know why you have removed a link on the pages hypnosis to William James. William James is the most important person in the american psychology, also called the father of american psychology. Each person studying psychology in America studies also some works of William James and they could be interested in knowing his point of view. More, it adds credibility to the subject of hypnosis as reading that Wiliam James worked on it shows that it is important. On the page hypnosis we have links to various institute and persons less important than him. Note that the link was only on an excerpt of a choices of pages speaking exclusively of hypnotism. May be it was just a mistake from your side. Thanks for your answer.

Apologies - was a little harsh - there were a few of these appearing. Have now reinstated. Thanks for your contribution and time. Kabads 20:09, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Forgot sig.

edit

Just thought I'd let you know that you seemed to forget your sig in the list of windmills vfd. You did read the part of the nomination where I mentioned that no windmills were listed on that page when you voted, right? The reasoning behind your vote seems very strange to me in light of this fact, but if that's really what you meant, I guess that's the way things are. - RedWordSmith 19:49, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)

  • thanks redwordsmith - i was in a hurry when I voted. Although that page does not have any windmills on it, it could easily hold them, in the same way that we have list of comedians, etc. I will try and change the format of it when I have more time. Kabads
    • Ok, fair enough. Don't forget to go back and add your sig. Understand that I'm not against the idea of a list of windmills, I just fail to see any point in a blank list, or even (as it stands right now) a list with a handful of items. This is why I tried running it through cleanup first. - RedWordSmith 23:28, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Tadley

edit

I see that you removed the reference to Tadley Treacle Mines from the Tadley page. 60 years ago Tadley was famous for its treacle mines :) 24.35.40.193 21:53, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC) I dont know what happened above, I got logged out and did not notice Oldfarm 22:00, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Jack Hargreaves

edit

Hi Kabads. I see you have reinserted the photo I removed from the article on Jack Hargreaves. It's no big deal but I have so many photos of my stepfather that I thought I'd take that one out because it wasn't one of him when younger and so damaged the sequence of pictures in the article. I thought that at some later date I would insert a carefully posed picture he had made of himself (on a postcard) in the 1930s that is quite striking and inconsistent with his later image.http://www.flickr.com/photo_settings.gne?id=506630864&photos_url=%2Fphotos%2Fsibadd%2Fpage2%2F What do you think? Simon Baddeley 22:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Simon, thanks for your explanation. It makes perfect sense to me. Go ahead and make your edits. The link to flickr is to a private page and so I can't see the photo you are planning to publish. Kabads 05:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Kabads. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Kabads. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Kabads. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Openwengo screenshot.png

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Openwengo screenshot.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:35, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Kabads. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

edit
 

Dear Kabads,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 15:14, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Oddlabs

edit
 

The article Oddlabs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 09:45, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply