K-Johnson 127

Welcome!

Hello, K-Johnson 127, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 18:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

August 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kentucky Educational Television has been reverted.
Your edit here to Kentucky Educational Television was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/KET?fref=nf) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

K-Johnson 127, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi K-Johnson 127! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Bluegrass Miracle, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Bluegrass Miracle was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ye-v9FSHbHQ) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:07, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Woah slow down!

You might want to look at this webpage [1]. It is the current mileage log for Kentucky. It is far superior to the broken link you are using from 2007. As mentioned before, you may also want to read WP:USRD/NEW, or you can just as me any questions you may have here or on my talk page. –Fredddie™ 03:44, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Can you start changing some editing practices with your writing so that others do not have to clean up after you create an article? Specifically:

• Please add "(KY #)" after the "Kentucky Route #" at the start of the first sentence. We need to include the abbreviation like this, and the parentheses around it are not put in boldface.
  • On the first mention of any U.S. Route, spell the name out in full and follow with "(US #)" after it. Then you can abbreviation every other U.S. Route. The same goes for Interstates: full name with abbreviation on first mention and abbreviated only on subsequent mentions.
  • When linking to U.S. Routes, please link to "U.S. Route X in Kentucky"; even if that article doesn't exist yet, it will either exist someday, or the link will redirect to the appropriate section of another article. The same goes for Interstates.
  • Also, don't make up names or abbreviations like "Kentucky State Highway X" or "Ky. Rte. X". Use a single naming convention and abbreviation style for consistency.
• It reads better to use "north–south" and "east–west", even if we write in south-to-north or west-to-east order. Except for one-way roads, it really wouldn't matter which way we write, but we've standardized on those directions for consistency.
• You should give the length of the highway in the lead.
• The "d" in "Route description" is never capitalized. Per MOS:HEAD, our headings are written in sentence case, not title case, which means only the first word and any proper nouns are capitalized, just like in a regular sentence.
• Since you should have added the abbreviation for a Kentucky route at in the first sentence (see my first bullet point), you can abbreviate every Kentucky route in the body of the article using "KY #"
• Where necessary, you should link to concurrency (road) (or its redirect/alternate, overlap (road), and you need to avoid using expressions like "multiplex".
  • For something like "It then heads for its first junction with Kentucky Route 728, and gets co-signed with that route for 1.902 miles" in Kentucky Route 1827, you can write "It then heads for its first junction with KY 728, and gets runs concurrently with that route for about two miles (3.2 km)."
• As you might have noticed, I rounded off the measurement in the example above. Such precision is unnecessary in running prose, and frankly, the only place you'd really need to give such a precise length is the total length of the highway in the lead. Also, you need to give metric conversions for standard American measurements. Not all of our readers are Americans.
• Dates should be in "Month DD, YYYY" format because these are articles about highways in the US. If you were writing about highways in other countries, then you should use the "DD Month YYYY" format. Match the format to the predominant style in that country. There is an exception for articles about the US military, but that doesn't apply here.
• Items linked in the "See also" section should not already be linked elsewhere in the article, per MOS:LAYOUT. That section is a good place to link to Portal:Kentucky and Portal:U.S. Roads. You should use {{portal-inline}} to make those links.
• You should double check to see if citations are broken before saving. If you insert a line break (return) in the middle of the value for a parameter in a citation template, it will break the template. For example, on Kentucky Route 357, you have:

<ref name=log>{{cite 
web|url=http://apps.transportation.ky.gov/DMI_Reports/Official_MP_RL_params.aspx|title=Official DMI Route Log|last=Commonwealth of 
Kentucky|accessdate=26 December 
2012}}</ref>

The line breaks in the middle of "Commonwealth of Kentucky" and "26 December 2012" break the template.

• Also, you need to be changing the accessdates. That should be the date you verified the information being cited in the article. You should not just be blindly copying citations (or the whole infobox) from one article to another without completely updating them.

I hope you can apply these minor changes so that other editors do not have to clean up errors and issues. Just about every time I see your user name on User:AlexNewArtBot/USRoadsSearchResult, I know that the article will need some formatting changes. I follow that report daily to find new articles that need to be tagged for the project (take a look at Talk:Kentucky Route 1827 for what we mean by tagging an article. That banner on the talk page helps us track the existence, quality, importance, and needs of an article. Imzadi 1979 → 05:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Some other quick comments:

• We don't list alternate names in the infobox unless each one applies to the full length of the highway.
• Please don't use the future tense in writing the route description sections. "KY 2195 enters southern Hart County, where it would intersect KY 1141..." can be "KY 2195 enters southern Hart County, where it intersects KY 1141..." and it reads much better.
• The first mention of a city gets linked, not the second. Per WP:OVERLINK, we don't relink items. There are a few exceptions for linking in the lead and then relinking in the body, or relinking from major section to major section on longer articles, but those exceptions would not apply because your articles are too short.
• per MOS:CONVERSIONS, we need to include the metric value of measurements. This can be done with {{convert}}.
  • If you need to make the measurement an adjective (i.e., 12.34-mile-long) then add |adj=mid followed by |-long or just use |adj=on to get something like 12.34-mile
  • If a length is rounded to an even mile, and the value is under 10, you can add |spell=in to spell the input value, five miles (8.0 km) .
• You should be adding Category:State highways in Kentucky to the article. Categories can take a sort key, and for that category, you should add |XXXX after Kentucky and before the ]]. For the XXXX, use a four-digit number, adding leading zeroes as necesary. So KY 90 gets "0090", KY 369 gets "069", and KY 1307 gets "1307".
• Also, avoid using left or right, and instead use cardinal directions like north or south to describe direction changes on a highway's routing. Imzadi 1979 → 03:21, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

And another thing, you can't cite other Wikipedia articles as a source in one you're writing or editing. If you verify a source used in another article, you can copy that citation across. In other words, you can't cite " List of state routes in Tennessee - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia" for the length of a highway in Tennessee. Imzadi 1979 → 04:11, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

The counties list in the infobox should be in geographical, not alphabetical, order. Imzadi 1979 → 04:45, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Your experience with Wikipedia so far

Hello K-Johnson 127,

I am conducting research about newcomers to Wikipedia and I was hoping to ask you some questions. I’ve noticed you’ve had some good activity recently. Is there any chance you have time in the next month to speak with me? If you are interested or have any questions, please email me at gmugar [at] syr.edu or leave a message on my talk page.

I hope to be in touch soon,

Gabrielm199 (talk) 23:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about WCTZ-LD

Hello, K-Johnson 127,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether WCTZ-LD should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WCTZ-LD .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Deunanknute (talk) 02:54, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (The Walk TV) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Walk TV, K-Johnson 127!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Five million articles

We've reached five million!!                                                   The English Wikipedia now has over 5,000,000 articles! Woo-hoo! Feel free to pass this message on! You can never celebrate too much. Eman235/talk 18:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Buzzr in Bowling Green?!

Buzzr coming to Bowling Green, KY? if you have please add it thank you Digifan23 (talk) 00:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by Antenna TV

Thank you for correcting me and fix all the edits. It is almost the end of 2015 and my brain is used to the current events. Since my correction was on the IPod Touch, it was hard for me to edit the stuff on it. Note to myself, next time use the computer to edit wikipedia information.

Citing the official Kentucky maps

I just created {{cite KYTC map}} to simplify citing the official maps. One big improvement is that it will properly cite the correct agency name (it's only been the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet since 1982) and supply full citation information, like map scales. In the future, if scales are found through library catalog records, they can be added to the template and every article will update automatically. Something similar happened after I poured through the library records for Michigan's older highway maps. Imzadi 1979 → 21:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hey, there! I just wanted to say thank you for creating Tennessee State Route 85!! It has been in my list of articles to create for a long time. Thank you! --ACase0000 (talk) 17:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Fixing heading

Per MOS:HEAD, the title of an article should not be repeated in the headings used within it unless necessary. That's why on Kentucky Route 80, I changed those headings to "<location> <type> route".

Another quick related item, but we should not be using "bannered route" for article titles or headings. I know it's out there in use, but it's really a roadgeek neologism that should be avoided. "Special routes" or "Related routes" makes a much better choice. You can even use "Business routes" if they're all classified that way, simplifying the subheaders to just the locations. Imzadi 1979 → 22:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

A polite request

Can you please do the following when creating articles, so that other editors don't have to follow behind you to clean them up?

1. We don't list alternate road names in the infobox unless they apply to the entire highway. If one half of a highway has one name, and the other half has a different name, neither name is listed in the infobox.
2. According to MOS:HEAD, headings are written in sentence case. That means we use "Route description" (lowercase "d") and not "Route Description".
3. We should link to the most specific topic and avoid placing links side by side. In other words, the region within the state is the more valuable link, and we should not pipe the link like you do just to allow the article to link to the state name. [[South Central Kentucky|South Central]] [[Kentucky]] should instead be just [[South Central Kentucky]].
4. When citing maps, and when you're using other templates from the Help:Citation Style 1 family, like {{cite web}}, you should use {{cite map}} instead of manually coding the citation. This solves inconsistency issues, like a capital letter on the word "page" when the templates use the standard abbreviation "p."
5. If the maps are contained within an atlas, you should supply the name of the map in |title=, and we should always supply the map's scale, or if the scale isn't noted, then |scale=Scale not given.
6. We don't insert spaces before a footnote nor between them.
7. The stub template, if appropriate, goes after the categories so that the categories it generates come last. This puts the emphasis on the other categories by listing them first.
8. As topics connected to the United States, we use the American style of date formats per MOS:DATE. This means Month DD, YYYY, dates, not DD Month YYYY.
9. When using the {{jct}} template in an infobox, we don't use |city1= to generate the link. That parameter is reserved for destination cities in junction lists, not the location of a junction.

If you have questions, please reply. We're a collaborative project here, and you'll find that many of us want to work together, but communication needs to be a two-way street. Other editors will come to you to help you improve your editing, but also to decrease the workload applied to others to end up with a high-quality and consistent finished product. Imzadi 1979 → 05:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Streets in Cave City, Kentucky has been nominated for discussion

Category:Streets in Cave City, Kentucky, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tinton5 (talk) 03:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Merger discussion for KJNE-LP

An article that you have been involved in editing—KJNE-LP —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Merger discussion for KJNB-LD

An article that you have been involved in editing—KJNB-LD —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, K-Johnson 127. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of National Weather Service Louisville, Kentucky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Weather Service Louisville, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Weather Service North Little Rock, Arkansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Proposed deletion of CTV (Tennessee)

The article CTV (Tennessee) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 02:00, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of EPB6

The article EPB6 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG & WP:BROADCAST

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 02:04, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of LEX TV

The article LEX TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 02:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of OCTV-71

The article OCTV-71 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 07:38, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of APSU-TV

The article APSU-TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, no independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 07:42, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of OCTV-71 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OCTV-71 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OCTV-71 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 00:10, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of VTV (Vanderbilt University)

The article VTV (Vanderbilt University) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, college tv station that is only available on the school's cable system.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 23:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Volunteer Channel

The article The Volunteer Channel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, only available on campus

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 04:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of UKTV (Kentucky)

The article UKTV (Kentucky) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 04:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ASU-TV

The article ASU-TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 04:36, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of APSU-TV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article APSU-TV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/APSU-TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 01:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Subchannel/Stations

Subchannels are a part of TV stations not TV stations in their own right. Per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations/Archive 10#Request for Comment: Notability of TV station subchannel articles subchannels do not automatically get their own article. So please don't start subchannel articles like you did at KAIT-DT2. Spshu (talk) 23:17, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

Hi K-Johnson 127. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article, Danika Brace. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 03:12, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

W240CP Logo

I thought you might be interested in knowing that I added a logo to your article W240CP and W239BT. User:Rudy2alan (talk)

February 2019

Not a good copy editor, are you? You correct some errors, but create new ones! And what's with the “curly quotes?” Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:58, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Edit-a-thon at Vanderbilt for REAL Symposium

Hope you can join us this Saturday!--Heathart (talk) 18:25, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Legends Football League/X League

Please stop calling this "new" league as EXTFL. There are ZERO references to support this abbreviation per WP:COMMONNAME or even WP:OFFICIALNAME. The league has not once used this abbreviation and is only its website because xleague.com/org and xfl are already taken. Please use reliable sources to support your assertions. Thank you, Yosemiter (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2002 in American television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KEGS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of former rebroadcasters of CBAFT-DT for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of former rebroadcasters of CBAFT-DT is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of former rebroadcasters of CBAFT-DT until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Raymie (t • c) 23:12, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Roads in Knoxville, Tennessee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roads in Knoxville, Tennessee, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roads in Knoxville, Tennessee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Green River Ferry Road

The article Green River Ferry Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for notability since 2015. I just can't see a way this gets past WP:GEOROAD. It's a small visitor use road in a national park. All of the sources are either maps or don't directly address this road itself. Other sources I can find are generally only passing mentions, either stating that the road has been closed, or in the context of how you get to Green River Ferry. The ferry itself may be notable, but this isn't a notable road.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MetroTV (Louisville, Kentucky)

The article MetroTV (Louisville, Kentucky) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable community access channel fails the WP:GNG and WP:BCAST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WROZ-TV

The article WROZ-TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It would appear that channel 61 never actually broadcast. See [2]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello

I have seen you have made pages of kentucky routes. If those are rural secondary or supplemental roads may add them to existing articles: i will tell you how at around 7:00 Central time TheGs2007 (talk) 12:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 1972 in television into 1972 in American television. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 01:02, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NFL Titans history

Template:NFL Titans history has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Faith Channel

The article The Faith Channel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Local cable TV channel fails to meet the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of WADA-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WADA-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WADA-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of WXOD-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WXOD-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WXOD-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:02, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, W34FG-D, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. So far nothing on the FCC pages of a call sign change to WBGS-LD, and RabbitEars says it still relays WBKO. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:09, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Category:DTV America has been nominated for merging

Category:DTV America has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:26, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Companies based in Sunrise, Florida

A tag has been placed on Category:Companies based in Sunrise, Florida indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:54, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, K-Johnson 127. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.ARamadan-WMF (talk) 12:48, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Splitting discussion for WPTD

An article that been involved with (WPTD) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article (WPTO). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:55, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on WNKY

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page WNKY, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:16, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Paradise, Kentucky

Thanks for your recent updates on Paradise, Kentucky. The information on the coal power plant there is not the latest. That plant has been converted totally to natural gas. The relevant article is Paradise Combined Cycle Plant. Not sure what the proper balance is between covering the former town and covering the plant, but I thought you might want this information. I grew up fewer than 10 miles from this location. Acdixon ^{(talk · contribs)} 14:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of WFEF-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WFEF-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WFEF-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of K30MF-D for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K30MF-D is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K30MF-D until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of KHIZ-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KHIZ-LD, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KHIZ-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Rivergate Parkway for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rivergate Parkway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rivergate Parkway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 03:05, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WNSH-LD

The article WNSH-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This station's short history has no SIGCOV in reliable sources (not blogs or listings); it is not eligible for a standalone article. A redirect to Marquee Broadcasting may be advisable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2001 SEC men's basketball tournament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memorial Gymnasium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Doctor Television Channel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doctor Television Channel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Television Channel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 13:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WDNZ-LD, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Triopoly.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Titans Preseason Football

The article Titans Preseason Football has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2017

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:29, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eggner's Ferry Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WKDZ.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2023 establishments in Kentucky

A tag has been placed on Category:2023 establishments in Kentucky indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of KQPS-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KQPS-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KQPS-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 01:04, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of KPLE-CD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KPLE-CD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KPLE-CD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 03:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of WLLP-CA for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WLLP-CA, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WLLP-CA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of WQEK-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WQEK-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WQEK-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 15:41, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of WQDT-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WQDT-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WQDT-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 03:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of W43DL-D

The article W43DL-D has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WBCF-LD

The article WBCF-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 15:59, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WBXP-LP for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WBXP-LP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBXP-LP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:20, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WZMC-LP for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WZMC-LP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WZMC-LP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WJDP-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WJDP-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WJDP-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KXAD-LD

The article KXAD-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 22:17, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KZCZ-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KZCZ-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KZCZ-LD (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 16:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WBNM-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WBNM-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBNM-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 14:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KVTU-LD

The article KVTU-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 18:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WLEK-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WLEK-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WLEK-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 20:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WKBJ-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WKBJ-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WKBJ-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 14:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KGMM-CD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KGMM-CD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KGMM-CD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of W17CT-D for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article W17CT-D is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W17CT-D until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 02:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WOCW-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WOCW-LD, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WOCW-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of W30EG-D for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article W30EG-D is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W30EG-D until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WNKY-LD

The article WNKY-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 22:30, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WHEH-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WHEH-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WHEH-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WVEB-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WVEB-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WVEB-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KDKW-LD

The article KDKW-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG with a lack of WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 03:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KPTB-DT

The article KPTB-DT has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 04:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KPTB-DT for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KPTB-DT is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KPTB-DT until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KAJF-LD

The article KAJF-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KAJF-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KAJF-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KAJF-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KAJL-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KAJL-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KAJL-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KFLU-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KFLU-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KFLU-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of K31KV-D

The article K31KV-D has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 22:12, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KPKN-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KPKN-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KPKN-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:29, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WAAO-LD

The article WAAO-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 19:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WHJC-LP

The article WHJC-LP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject lacks secondary sources with which to meet the WP:GNG or WP:NBASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 04:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KUOC-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KUOC-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KUOC-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 06:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of former Kentucky Educational Television translators for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of former Kentucky Educational Television translators is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of former Kentucky Educational Television translators until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WVVC-LD

The article WVVC-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 23:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on List of former Kentucky Educational Television translators

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of former Kentucky Educational Television translators, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WCQT-LD

The article WCQT-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 02:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:KJTB-LD

Hello, K-Johnson 127. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "KJTB-LD".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WZTS-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WZTS-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WZTS-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 20:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Walk TV

The article The Walk TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 19:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WRCZ-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WRCZ-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WRCZ-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 20:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WDSF-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WDSF-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WDSF-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WUDZ-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WUDZ-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WUDZ-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WNCB-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WNCB-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WNCB-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KCYM-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KCYM-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KCYM-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 21:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WSON, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC Radio.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KAXW-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KAXW-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KAXW-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WCQT-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WCQT-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WCQT-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 01:08, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KFVT-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KFVT-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KFVT-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 06:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KCMN-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KCMN-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KCMN-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 07:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KAKZ-LD

The article KAKZ-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WTZP-LD

The article WTZP-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WUOA-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WUOA-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WUOA-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

WBKO

I don't understand? Why does it matter how many logos are in infobox? Junebug3000 (talk) 07:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WARZ-LD

The article WARZ-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WDHC-LD

The article WDHC-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; some sources are questionable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 06:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WCKV-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WCKV-LD, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WCKV-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WUSV-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WUSV-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WUSV-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WDHC-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WDHC-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WDHC-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KCIB-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KCIB-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KCIB-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 12:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WBNM-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WBNM-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBNM-LD (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 06:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of K23LB-D for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K23LB-D is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K23LB-D until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WNKJ-TV

The article WNKJ-TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A recent review of FCC records, available literature, and the Kentucky New Era indicates that WNKJ-TV never broadcast, even though a permit was awarded. The FCC lists the permit as deleted May 7, 1984. We do not maintain articles, except in exceptional circumstances, on TV station permits that were not constructed, which applies to WNKJ-TV and the second attempt at the allocation, WKKT-TV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WNKJ-TV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WNKJ-TV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WNKJ-TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)