- It appears that my account has been blocked. I haven't been notified.
- I am a constructive user. Since all blocks must be preventive, there is no valid reason to block this account, whether there is block evasion or not.
- All the CU does is link this account to previous accounts on this IP that were equally constructive.
- This account is not a sockpuppet. It is simply my current account. I have never edited with more than one account.
- In contrast to the allegation, there exists no link to an ancient banned user Roadcreature. I am not that person.
- So far, not a single administrator has been willing to investigate this. Instead, administrators keep closing user talk pages shouting abuse, when no abuse has taken place.
- Continuously stalking, checking, blocking and silencing a constructive user, and reverting their good edits on false grounds, without a shred of evidence, is highly disruptive.
- Repeatedly outing a locally vanished user (but not on other wikimedia projects, where they are a user in good standing), making a point of it even, violates banning policy.
- The allegation originates from nl:Wikipedia, where I made the 'mistake' of commenting positively on nl:Wikipedia's local competitor.
- It appears that nl:Wikipedia entertains an everlasting smear campaign against user Roadcreature, the owner of the other encyclopedia.
- Evidence against the allegation, which was provided by nl:Wikipedia users, got oversighted, and all the users providing the evidence were blocked.
- @Ritchie333, Doug Weller, and Darkoneko: Random selection. I'd appreciate it if an uninvolved admin would do a proper investigation, rather than blindly believe what someone from nl:Wikipedia says. Jyl (talk) 21:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
For the record, I am not user Dailyshampoo48 either. Jyl (talk) 16:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)