Your submission at Articles for creation: Linkurious (April 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 18:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linkurious (April 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yashovardhan Dhanania was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yashovardhan (talk) 12:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Jvilledieu, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Yashovardhan (talk) 12:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Linkurious has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Linkurious. Thanks! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linkurious has been accepted

edit
 
Linkurious, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Linkurious

edit
 

The article Linkurious has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

clear promotional therefore DELETE. No historical value or of any other sort. No really any reason this article to exist in WP. Probably also of WP:COI from the major contributor of this article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 188.4.85.230 (talk) 21:14, 6 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Linkurious for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linkurious is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linkurious until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beritagsier (talk) 20:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply