User talk:Justiyaya/Archive 4
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi
All the content which I had recently deleted about "ancestral history of Gaikwad" had no actual references. If fact in some of the references were forged and then deleted when post was accepted, e.g. check very first reference. In case you have noticed, I am Gaikwad too and the written lines were kind of not acceptable to my caste opinions. So please, it is offensive to our feelings, remove them. Next time I suggest please verify references and authenticity of there sources. Thank you. Prashantvg03 (talk) 15:00, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Prashantvg03, I'm assuming that you are a sockpuppet of Prashant Vijay Gaikwad, please correct me if I'm wrong. If you are a sockpuppet, you do have to disclose it by following instructions on WP:ALTACCN. With that out of the way, I have reverted your edit because of the information that was removed without edit summary or explanation and because the edit was at a level not fit for publication, mainly due to errors in grammar. Based on your message, you might be too passionate about the subject to keep editing this page, maybe try editing another article. Justiyaya (talk) 16:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 June 2021
- News and notes: Elections, Wikimania, masking and more
- In the media: Boris and Joe, reliability, love, and money
- Disinformation report: Croatian Wikipedia: capture and release
- Recent research: Feminist critique of Wikipedia's epistemology, Black Americans vastly underrepresented among editors, Wiki Workshop report
- Traffic report: So no one told you life was gonna be this way
- News from the WMF: Searching for Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: WikiProject on open proxies interview
- Forum: Is WMF fundraising abusive?
- Discussion report: Reliability of WikiLeaks discussed
- Obituary: SarahSV
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
- An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.
Technical news
- IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.
Arbitration
- The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.
Trouted
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 2601:197:4480:F0:51D7:7286:4AD5:7D16 (talk) 15:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Your contributions to the Bret Weinstein page have unfairly taken a stance I believe to be misleading, as it implies a judgment that "good science" is only that which passes through to mainstream channels. Good science is tainted by financial interests, and so it is nearly impossible to "know" what is true, especially in an ever-evolving situation such as this pandemic. It is important not to paint folks as villains simply for questioning the legitimacy of the current narrative.
Can you help me in signature adding?
I couldn't add the rainbow signature. I think it due to limit of words. KatieAllie 06:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Did you paste this signature in or did you use the
~~~~method? Justiyaya 06:13, 6 July 2021 (UTC)- yes but I could not add the complete signature KatieAllie 06:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- @KatieAllie: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Katie_Allie&oldid=1032230400 Justiyaya 06:32, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- yes but I could not add the complete signature KatieAllie 06:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Empower Work (July 9)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Empower Work and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Empower Work, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Justiyaya!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Empower Work (July 9)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Empower Work and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Empower Work, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
A barnstar for you!
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| Congratulations on being in the top 5 most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Great job. –Novem Linguae (talk) 03:32, 13 July 2021 (UTC) |
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
123.195.130.73 (talk) 11:56, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello!
Moved from User:JustiyayaHello Justiyaya. I see you blocked @LaceyUF. I do not see a reason for you to do this. I don't know why you blocked him/her. So, why did you do this?Sparklestern (talk) 21:42, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oh hi, I am not an admin, so I cannot block any users. LaceyUF is blocked by arbcom and I believe that parts of the evidence is oversighted/suppressed, although there was a thread at [1] that might offer some explanation. Justiyaya 05:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Sparklestern: Justiyaya 05:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
WikipediaGuy32
Moved from User:Justyaya Justiyaya 19:08, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the friendly message! WikipediaGuy32 (talk) 17:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- @WikipediaGuy32: Your welcome, next time remember to use my talk page, most users will not be notified by userpage messages (and it's often considered bad form). Also, sorry about the late reply. Justiyaya 19:08, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for your hard work on PCR! Firestar464 (talk) 09:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC) |
- @Firestar464: Thanks! Justiyaya 09:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
hi, curious as to why you reverted my edits. the page needs some tightening and the timeline is very hard to follow. 79.180.250.121 (talk) 20:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for leaving a message on my talk page before reverting the edit, I really appreciate it. I have reverted your edits because they contained spelling issues, but I have also noticed major Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style issues, specifically MOS:HEAD, or Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Layout#Headings_and_sections which basically says that level 1 headers (one equals sign) are "never appropriate within the body of articles". Justiyaya 20:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- ah, i see. i was too lazy to dig into the subsections and add the extra == to all. i'll do it properly (and fix the typos). 79.180.250.121 (talk) 20:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- done. i think the page is clearer now, though the "First wave" section would benefit from some editing. 79.180.250.121 (talk) 20:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- i'm a main contributer of text on that page, i'd say it will be ok. i opened a section on the talk page there to discuss. 79.180.250.121 (talk) 20:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Re: Dagestan
In reference to this proper revert by you;[2] the operator of that 2603:xxxx IP range has been trying, for over three years now, to remove, change and to deny the long-standing Iranian and Azeri influence and presence in Caucasus-related articles. Simultaneously, he tries to inflate (without sources and edit summary) population figures for Caucasus related ethnicities such as Lezgins, Avars, etc. I reported the range some time ago at WP:ANI which resulted in a range block, (see this for more information) but he returned as soon as his block ended. Its probably one (if not the most) persistent disruptive LTA IP hoppers I have seen in a long time. Thought you might be interested. Best, - LouisAragon (talk) 22:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Oshwah: You conducted a range block last time, could you do another one? He's still at it as we speak.[3]-[4] - LouisAragon (talk) 22:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Definitely looks like a ranged block is justified. ––FORMALDUDE(talk) 23:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
- @LouisAragon: Thank you for informing me. (I'm really confused about IP stuff, so I'm going to look that up...) Justiyaya 23:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Definitely looks like a ranged block is justified. ––FORMALDUDE(talk) 23:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| For your tireless contributions preventing vandalism! ––FORMALDUDE(talk) 15:31, 21 July 2021 (UTC) |
Nausicaa
Justiyaya in response to the Nausicaa Wikipedia page changes it in regards to the fact there already references, citations and so forth of the film as an Japan Animated Film (it was awarded this as well and so on).
I called it an unnecessary change because it wouldn't make a difference since both International Overseas and in Japan the film was well acclaimed as an Animated Movie in general.
Its certainly Neutral to let it be what it was acclaimed for? Everyone knows its an Japanese Animated Movie so its that's why I said it was unnecessary Justiyaya.
(Also that sentence keeps being deleted constantly without a great enough explanation in the past) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.16.177.52 (talk) 22:31, July 22, 2021 (UTC)
- Hi anon (User:100.16.177.52), thank you for posting a question to my talk page, your edit (in my opinion) doesn't follow some wikipedia guidelines, such as MOS:PUFFERY, your edit contains "It is frequently ranked as one of the greatest animated films ever made [closing brackets added by me]." greatest is an opinionated term and I believe that if you changed it to something along the lines of "It is the highest ranked Japanese anime in a survey published by the Japan’s Agency for Cultural Affairs in 2007." would be better and probably more accurate. Although I would still question why it belongs in the lead, the validity of the citation and (because it's quite outdated) why it belongs in the article at all. Justiyaya 04:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Sergey Brin
Hello. This romanization is very uncommon and is not used outside of linguistic studies.Typically romanizations do not include additional letters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.197.251.217 (talk) 12:52, July 25, 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, I believe you are referring to my edit here, thank you for justifying your changes. I don't know how the other editors will feel about this, but I'll accept it for now. Justiyaya 13:38, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! Have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.197.251.217 (talk) 16:40, July 25, 2021 (UTC)
Note: InfiniteNexus you have become Sinebot :D Justiyaya 20:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
, though SineBot does not catch all unsigned comments, which is where {{Unsigned}} and {{UnsignedIP}} come in. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:13, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Yea InfiniteNexus, I'm just quite lazy and really should've done that before. (btw SineBot seems to be down right now) Justiyaya 20:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
Technical news
- Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
Arbitration
- Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.
Miscellaneous
- You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.
A barnstar for you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| Hey Justiyaya, I am awarding you this barnstar for all the work you do to keep Wikipedia a nice, friendly place to be. Thanks also for the message on my talk page! Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs!) 23:52, 6 August 2021 (UTC) |
- @Liamyangll: Thanks for the barnstar :D Justiyaya 00:00, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Lilburn family article
Hello Justiyaya, I'm frankly rather saddened and bewildered by the way two editors have now decided to take me to task for improving an article that was previously nothing but a collection of disconnected factoids, half-truths and outright falsehoods, many stemming from sources such as "House of Names" which I replaced in many cases with carefully researched published sources, removing that which was unsupported by sources and reorganising the article to have some form of structure and focus. I'm afraid I simply don't have it in me to argue and back-and-forth after years on Wikipedia seeing it go nowhere, but I repeat I am saddened that my improvements have been disregarded out of hand; if you and Sakura can genuinely look at both versions of the article and consider its previous form superior, then I really don't know what to say, but I shan't be editing it further.
The Signpost: 25 July 2021
- News and notes: Wikimania and a million other news stories
- Special report: Hardball in Hong Kong
- In the media: Larry is at it again
- Board of Trustees candidates: See the candidates
- Traffic report: Football, tennis and marveling at Loki
- News from the WMF: Uncapping our growth potential – interview with James Baldwin, Finance and Administration Department
- Humour: A little verse
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Andrew Cuomo on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Trouted
|
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Bmc hit (talk) 18:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC) Sorry, but this was obviously a way of getting as many Wikipedia edits in as possible without you checking the likelihood of the Netherlands banning the breeding of pugs. https://www.vettimes.co.uk/news/dutch-to-crack-down-on-breeding-of-dogs-with-too-short-snouts/
- Hi Bmc hit thank you for your suggestions on my edits, I assume you are referring to this edit here, I still think that the revert was completely fine based on WP:UNSOURCED, which basically says that the burden on adding citations to verify the information is on the editor adding the information, because you didn't provide a citation, I assumed that it was not verifiable, if all the information in the added paragraph was supported by citations, I'm sure that other editors will accept the edit :D Justiyaya 01:48, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Justiyaya not sure why you reverted my comment again. In my second submission I added the publicaton Vettimes. Please explain why you removed it for the second time, despite my addition of the reference. Did you not see that? The reference about the Netherlands is even on the German Wikipedia site. Forgive me, but I am not happy with people just adding badges to their Wikipedia profile.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmc hit (talk • contribs)
- @Bmc hit: No, I did not revert your edit, FlightTime did. The reason given for the revert was that the edit required a "reference on nose length", On your accusation that editors are "getting as many Wikipedia edits" as possible, Wikipedians mainly value "Quality, not quantity" although edit counts are important for measuring the amount of someone's contributions, it shouldn't be the only measure, and it's definitely not an accurate measurement, regardless, there are probably much faster ways of making edits than what I usually do (WP:PCR and WP:HUGGLE) Justiyaya 02:13, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Okay I apologise for my accusation, but it is hard to not suspect that it is quantity over quality when a comment that is widely known as fact among vets is removed a couple of times. The latest reversal by Flighttime is absolutely ridiculous. I doubt that the man knows of the importance of the magazine Vettimes amongst vets.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmc hit (talk • contribs)
- @Bmc hit: No, I'm quite sure FlightTime did not revert based on the grounds that the citation you provided was not reliable enough, and no, I don't think the revert was "absolutely ridiculous", after having another look at it, I don't think the information improves the article, if you read the section that you changed, you would find that most of the information are general information about health problems and not local laws and regulations, it would've fitted more if you had added it in the 21st century section (although It's probably still questionable if it fits in the article), but I would strongly support discussing it with FlightTime before making further changes to the page. Justiyaya 14:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
I just read FlightTime's message, and no it has nothing to do with your assumption that the information does not improve the article. Here is his response to me: "No matter who they are (Vetttimes the magazine), you made specific claims about the the length of their muzzle which is not mentioned or supported in the reference you provided. I'll let another (more experienced in this area) editor handle the issue. Cheers,
My response to him was a quote from the article which referred to a traffic light system of head measurement using red, orange and green classifications in the Netherlands. Here is a further quote from the article: "Red applies to dogs with a snout length shorter than a third of the skull, such as the pug, and English and French bulldogs. Breeding with these dogs is prohibited immediately."
I also added that I am dating a vet and spent the last weekend with a further five vets. Brachycephalic dogs are a constant source of conversation, so I and the well-known publication Vettimes have more than a vague idea of what we are talking about. It is probably the name of the Wikipedia game that some may find certain information more valuable than others. Vets don't read Wikipedia to find information on this particular topic, but lay people do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmc hit (talk • contribs) 16:59, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Bmc hit: Hi, I think it would be more appropriate talking to FlightTime about the verifiability portion of the edit, I don't think I ever claimed that the second edit was not verifiable. Again, restating my opinion on the edits, I still don't think the specific law in the Netherlands should be included in the article, I would support FlightTime's proposal for someone more experienced to look at the edits and give another opinion, maybe someone who copyedited the page or has experience in these types of articles. Justiyaya 09:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 August 2021
- News and notes: Enough time left to vote! IP ban
- In the media: Vive la différence!
- Wikimedians of the year: Seven Wikimedians of the year
- Gallery: Our community in 20 graphs
- News from Wiki Education: Changing the face of Wikipedia
- Recent research: IP editors, inclusiveness and empathy, cyclones, and world heritage
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Days of the Year Interview
- Traffic report: Olympics, movies, and Afghanistan
- Community view: Making Olympic history on Wikipedia