User talk:Jurta/Archive 1

Latest comment: 4 months ago by KockaAdmiralac in topic Undertale Yellow draft

Welcome!

Hi Jurtaa! I noticed your contributions to Windows 11 and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! – voidxor 19:22, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Prem Prakash Modi

Hi, @Jurtaa:How it's you going? I know Indian has the Vowel at the beginning but in persons death After use an . (1) Ex - Mahatma Gandhi was an Indian lawyer. JiggyzizTalk✍️ 14:50, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

The death of a person does not affect whether one should use "a" or "an". It all depends on whether the word after the determiner has a vowel sound at the beginning. Jurtaa (talk) 14:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Jurtaa Thanks. Best Regards JiggyzizTalk✍️ 15:24, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Unblock request

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jurta (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Williampro36585". The reason given for Williampro36585's block is: "Vandalism".</nowiki>

Decline reason:

Same person. Now directly blocked. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:49, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jurta (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not the same person who decided to vandalise the wiki, I was using my account on the same IP address that the culprit was also on, and I am in no way affiliated with the person in question, nor was I encouraging their actions. Jurtaa (talk) 16:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

On second thought, looking at Jurtaa's edits, it looks to me like this really is a case of a decent editor in a classroom full of children. I'm unblocking. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:39, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Do you think we are stupid, you "just so" happen to be on the same IP as the very vandal you were reverting whose autoblock you were caught in? Either that is an insane coincidence or you are not being honest with us. Lavalizard101 (talk) 17:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
It occured at school, that's why I got caught in the autoblock. I decided it would be a good idea to use my account at school while one of my classmates was vandalising the wiki. Jurtaa (talk) 17:18, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poppy Playtime (October 30)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:07, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

hello

Hello, thanks for reverting the vandalism on the Ludmilla Tchérina page. Can you please check this discussion out and share your thoughts? Best wishes, AdigabrekTalk   14:31, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

well, i think it's best to just ignore him for now and let the admins deal with it. AdigabrekTalk   21:11, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
I'm just scared of being seen as racist, that's not my intentions at all. Hopefully the admins do sort this out. Jurtaa (talk) 08:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Parishes

Thankyou for you're work on creating missing civil parishes in Devon and Gloucestershire, I'm assuming you're getting them from Wikipedia:WikiProject England/The West Country Challenge/Missing article hotlist but I have produced a more up to date missing parish list, see User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes (1)#Devon and User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes (2)#Gloucestershire. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:12, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crab Game has been accepted

 
Crab Game, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liancetalk/contribs 22:07, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Bagenal's Castle

On 11 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bagenal's Castle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bagenal's Castle was originally thought to have been destroyed, but was rediscovered in 1996 in the premises of a bakery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bagenal's Castle. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bagenal's Castle), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Crab Game

On 25 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Crab Game, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a bug in Crab Game caused multiple IP addresses to be leaked? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Crab Game. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Crab Game), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poppy Playtime has been accepted

 
Poppy Playtime, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Kristin McQuaid

Hello, you helped out by moving my draft to a new category and it has since been at a standstill, do you have any idea why the page still hasn't been reviewed? Someone on the talk page suggested: "May be a factor: See the edits for 29 October. Article submitted while in User space, then moved to Draft space, and a bot deleted an apparently related template." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taylorfox1992 (talkcontribs) 17:04, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

No, I have no idea how the review process works. It's best to just be patient. Jurta talk 17:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For improving Poppy Playtime. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 17:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Progress chart

Like Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge/ProgressChart on my progress chart for the parishes we're now at 7% after you're new articles. Thankyou for you're new articles of which I have expanded. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Pl

Play 103.139.191.226 (talk) 04:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Original Barnstar
good natured barnstar for This Rain Will Never Stop ♠Vami_IV†♠ 09:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for your efforts

  The Current Events Barnstar
Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)
  The Original Barnstar
Awarded for being the top contributor to an article related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
  The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Awarded for efforts in expanding multiple articles to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doug (tuber) has been accepted

 
Doug (tuber), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Schwede66 19:11, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Dalton Mills

On 20 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dalton Mills, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that copper thieves started a fire at Dalton Mills in 2011 while trying to burn off the insulation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dalton Mills. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dalton Mills), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Doug (tuber) for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doug (tuber) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug (tuber) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kingoflettuce (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

I believe you made a mistake reverting my edit.

Recently, you archived an edit I made on Crab Game because I didn't have sources. However, the source is the game itself, not an external article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpiderBreadIRL (talkcontribs)

That doesn't apply to gameplay sections, see MOS:VG#Gameplay. Jurta talk 15:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Ignore all rules states that if a rule gets in the way of a good contribution, you should simply ignore it, which is what I did. I believe that I don't need a source because it is a correct edit backed by information in the game, and the Ignore All Rules policy is in place, and I am going to put my edit back. SpiderBreadIRL (talk) 18:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
WP:WIARM, and, like I said earlier, this doesn't apply to gameplay sections as MOS:VG#Gameplay states that "As with most Wikipedia content, gameplay details must be appropriately verifiable to reliable sources." Jurta talk 19:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Well, after rereading the VG#Gameplay article, I realize that I was wrong in putting my edit back, my apologies. SpiderBreadIRL (talk) 02:40, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Doug (tuber)

On 7 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Doug (tuber), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Doug was nominated to Guinness World Records as the world's largest potato before genetic testing confirmed that it was actually a tuber of a gourd? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Doug (tuber). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Doug (tuber)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

  Hook update
Your hook reached 14,167 views (590.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of May 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 09:30, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jurta

Thank you for creating Mykhailivka-Rubezhivka.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Poppy playtime chapter 3 release date

Hey Jurta, Here is proof that chapter 3 is unknown

Have a nice day, Liam Stoneback

From there discord, look at the Game faq

https://discord.gg/poppyplaytime

Read through faq YTLiamStoneback (talk) 21:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Discord is not an appropriate source to use as it requires one to join a server in order to access information. Sources that are available online with no need for signing up are more viable. (Make sure to read WP:RS!) Jurta talk 21:54, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

  Hi Iceyawesome (talk) 05:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Little Kitty, Big City

  Hello, Jurta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Little Kitty, Big City, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello Jurta! Per your split of the Criticism of Facebook article in February 2022, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind reviewing and leaving comments in the section I added to its talk page on 4 March 2023 to facilitate a new discussion about a potential move review and splits, merges, and retitle proposals for Meta Platforms family of articles. Thanks! -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:47, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Franco Orsucci

This was previously moved to draft space prior to the article creator moving it yet again to the mainspace. Unless something has changed recently, we customarily send those to AfD instead of back to draft. I left a message for the user who orignally moved it to draft but no response as of yet. The subject would technically meet notability guidelines based on his fellowships. Although, I hate the low bar for WP:NACADEMICS based on fellowships alone. CNMall41 (talk) 04:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Ah, thanks for letting me know! Jurta talk/he/they 08:34, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
  The Working Man's Barnstar
Thank you for editing the List of Wikipedia controversies page!! By doing that, you make this place (Wikipedia) a hell of a lot better! Keep working hard, and i'm sure we'll cross paths again, and your earn another Barnstar!! I cant wait! :)Babysharkboss2 was here!! 16:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Undertale Yellow Screenshot.png

 

Thanks for uploading File:Undertale Yellow Screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Undertale Yellow draft

Hey, since you appear to have experience with Wikipedia's policies on drafts and article creation, what do you think about submitting Draft:Undertale Yellow for review, and what issues would we need to address before you think the AfC reviewers would deem it acceptable? I've seen notability concerns raised by the anonymous user, but NegativeMP1's response on the talk page seems to properly address that. Cheers! KockaAdmiralac (talk) 02:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)