JurisDigital
This is JurisDigital's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: GOBER ET AL. V. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY sexual harassment case (April 5)
edit- Draft:GOBER ET AL. V. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY sexual harassment case may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, JurisDigital!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 06:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
|
AfC notification: Draft:Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma (Peggy) Noland, Suzanne Papiro and Tina Swann Against Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs) has a new comment
editYour submission at Articles for creation: Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma (Peggy) Noland, Suzanne Papiro and Tina Swann Against Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs) (September 19)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma (Peggy) Noland, Suzanne Papiro and Tina Swann Against Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
September 2022
editHello JurisDigital. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JurisDigital. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=JurisDigital|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
I note that you edit in matters of law, and that https://jurisdigital.com is a legal marketing agency. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma (Peggy) Noland, Suzanne Papiro and Tina Swann Against Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs)
editHello, JurisDigital. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma (Peggy) Noland, Suzanne Papiro and Tina Swann Against Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma (Peggy) Noland, Suzanne Papiro and Tina Swann Against Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs)
editHello, JurisDigital. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:40, 26 July 2023 (UTC)