Jureperitus
Jureperitus, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Jureperitus! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 13 October 2019 (UTC) |
October 2020 edit
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Quantum Leap, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please review WP:IPCV as well. DonIago (talk) 17:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
The article European Journal for Philosophy of Religion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The only source is a link to the journal's own web site, which doesn't say much and should no longer be considered reliable. No sources are given for the Chinese sale nor for the replacement journal, nor could I find any elsewhere. We cannot include this material without a source nor should we cut this back to a stub that includes only what can be sourced but fails to warn readers about the current state of the journal. Therefore, deletion seems like the appropriate outcome.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)