March 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Arnie Lerma, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:49, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:29, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jupitersdreaming (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #20964 was submitted on Mar 22, 2018 08:03:10. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 08:03, 22 March 2018 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jupitersdreaming (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #20970 was submitted on Mar 22, 2018 12:49:49. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 12:49, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Block appeal edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jupitersdreaming (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am new to wikipedia editing. I tried to respond to an admin message that asked for clarification to a response I had given to him. The admin had agreed that the original edit about the death of an individual was inappropriate- I edited it for that reason as it was unverified. I told the admin my reason for wanting that content removed. I mentioned I was seeking legal advice but I did not mean against Wikipedia- the entire death is being investigated -hence the oruginal content was inappropriate. I did not nor do I have any issue with Wikipedia and I was grateful the content was removed and I never had any issue legally with Wikipedia. Sadly,I got blocked before I finished typing my explanation.

Accept reason:

Thank you for clarifying that statement. Your account is now unblocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:41, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Jupitersdreaming Jupitersdreaming (talk) 19:20, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good to me. We will see how @Oshwah:feels.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Dlohcierekim - Thanks for the ping. The unblock appeal and explanation is good enough for me; the user clarified their statement and made clear that it wasn't an implication of taking legal action per WP:NLT. The user is now unblocked :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Block appeal edit

Thank you admins for being so understanding and for your earlier help ~Oshwah~ Jupitersdreaming (talk) 20:03, 22 March 2018 (UTC) JupitersdreamingReply

Of course; you're very welcome - that's what admins should be here to do. I'm sorry to hear that you were blocked before being able to clarify the statement. Either way, no harm done :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:06, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply