JumpingJimmySingh

Welcome

Hello, JumpingJimmySingh, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! regentspark (comment) 20:49, 13 June 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

India League

I am trying to create a page on historical group called 'The India League'

--JumpingJimmySingh (talk) 00:49, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

I see you've successfully created a draft and submitted it for review. If you have questions about how to edit Wikipedia, please be more specific about what you need help with. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:08, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you :)

Thanks again for your help. How do I ensure that page is SEO? For example, when somebody types in 'India League or 'The India League' into Google, this Wiki page comes up. At the moment, nothing comes up from a Google Search. Warm regards, Jimmy.

Drafts do not show up on a Google search until they are submitted and approved. It will also take some time for Google to catch up and start showing the page on its listings. For what reason do you need to make it show on Google? - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Richard. Has the India League page been approved? The reason why I ask is that everybody seems to confuse 'The India League' with the 'Indian Independence League'. I'm a researcher in the field of the Indian freedom struggle in Britain and just want to ensure that the best information is made available :)

See below, it has been accepted - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:01, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

I am trying to upload a picture of the logo to the 'India League' page. I own these historical document where the logo is shown and I took a picture of it (the logo) with my camera. However, I get this message -

'We could not determine whether this file is suitable for Wikimedia Commons. Please only upload photos that you took yourself with your camera, or see what else is acceptable. See the guide to make sure the file is acceptable and learn how to upload it on Wikimedia Commons.' Could you please assist me in uploading the logo? Thank you.

Hello, Jimmy! Since the photo you are trying to upload is of a logo, it falls under the non-free content jurisdiction, and as such may be uploaded, but with some restrictions. I would recommend using the File Upload Wizard to upload this image. Make sure to name the article you will use it in and that the image is the logo of an organization. You will have to provide the source of the logo and any copyright information on it. You may then add the image to the article. For any other questions on images with logos, I would recommend reading through WP:LOGO. Hope this helped! Pupsterlove02 talk • contribs 22:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: India League has been accepted

India League, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 08:06, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ujagar Singh Rurka

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ujagar Singh Rurka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kaisertalk (talk) 01:55, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: V P Hansrani (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:V P Hansrani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:V P Hansrani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, JumpingJimmySingh! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Mohyal Brahmin

Hi, I've had to revert your big edit at Mohyal Brahmin. A lot of it was based on the first two new sources that you introduced - Strachey and the caste history - but we do not consider Raj era sources to be reliable, nor are histories of a caste usually acceptable (especially not if written or published by members of the caste).{{pb}]It was difficult for me to untangle what might be useful among the rest of your edit because you seemed to have built something of a house of cards, with other statements being dependent on those verified to the two sources I have just mentioned. It is quite possible that somewhere in that lot there was something reliably sourced, useful and capable of standing on its own without any synthesis etc. I wouldn't have a problem with such things being reinstated but it might be better to raise them at Talk:Mohyal Brahmin first and get some sort of consensus. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bhagat Singh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 16:00, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ujagar Singh Rurka

Hello, JumpingJimmySingh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ujagar Singh Rurka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Dr Nikita Ved moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dr Nikita Ved, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 02:13, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Dr Nikita Ved moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dr Nikita Ved, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 02:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikita Ved (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikita Ved and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nikita Ved, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī ^(talk) 10:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Nikita Ved

Hello, JumpingJimmySingh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nikita Ved, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of India League

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on India League requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.1928institute.org/our-journey. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:59, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, JumpingJimmySingh. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:15, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

- - - - - - - - Hey there, thank you for your message. I do not have any conflict of interests to declare...I am just a keen observer of British Indians and wish to add the Wiki's knowledge base. I have made numerous edits on Wiki and could you continue to let me edit the British Indians page?

September 2021

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:26, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Minor edits

Hello Jimmy, I’ve just seen your edit to Udham Singh (which was very useful, thank you) and wanted to let you know that marking edits as minor when they change content, as you have done, is confusing and considered poor etiquette. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Happy editing! postleft ✍ (Arugula) ☞ say hello! 20:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Copyright problem: India League (1928 Institute)

Hello JumpingJimmySingh! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as India League (1928 Institute), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://web.archive.org/web/20210907075921/https://www.1928institute.org/our-journey, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:India League (1928 Institute) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, India League (1928 Institute), in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:India League (1928 Institute). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:India League (1928 Institute) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:India League (1928 Institute) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 21:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC) - - - - - - Thank you Dianne, I appreciate the advise. I have all the relevant permissions and the website-owner has sent at e-mail and has left a note on Talk:India League (1928 Institute). Could you please advise on next steps? Will the page get reinstated now? Thank you once again.

JumpingJimmySingh (talk) 17:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

There's no note at Talk:India League (1928 Institute), JumpingJimmySingh. That page doesn't yet exist because no one has posted anything there. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:15, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

...I should clarify that I don't think this necessarily matters as long as the e-mail has been sent. That said, the article needs to be based largely on independent sources, not on text from the institute's own website. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:44, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, has somebody deleted the page? I believe the owners on the page gave permission for it to be used but I can't seem to find it now. JumpingJimmySingh (talk) 00:55, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at India League. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Cordless Larry I've used the recent BBC article as a source and have referred to these two sentences. The hidden story of these early pioneers has been highlighted by The 1928 Institute think tank, set up to research and represent British Indians. Formerly known as the India League, the organisation has since rebranded due to its work with the University of Oxford. I think it's important to highlight why the name change occurred. The BBC have conducted their own research and they made made statement (as opposed to using a quote) - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-58627849. Could this please be reflected on the page to improve its accuracy?

JumpingJimmySingh (talk) 11:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Let's discuss this at Talk:India League, which is a more appropriate venue. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:08, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

I have only edited the page from my account and none-other. Why would I use another account? What proof is there that I've used another account? I am being blocked and silenced from editing because my arguments have logic and another member is trying to bully me into submission.

JumpingJimmySingh (talk) 22:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is India League. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (India League) for COI editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 21:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• This is more or less pro forma, as you've been doing the proper thing most recently, which is discussing matters on the talk page, for which I thank you. Nevertheless, I would like to stave off any potential disruption. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 21:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JumpingJimmySingh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here JumpingJimmySingh (talk) 22:21, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

None of the below is relevant to your block. You were blocked because we believe you violated WP:COI. That and only that is relevant here. Yamla (talk) 22:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My evidence and arguments on the page are cogent and correct. You can see the evidence for yourself and come to the same conclusion that the 1928 Institute is the rebranded India League. I am being silenced as another editor is unable to argue with my points and is bullying me into submission. Furthermore, I have only edited the page from my account and none-other. I am on Wikipedia for the public good and shouldn't have to waste my time getting bullied and silenced.

JumpingJimmySingh (talk) 22:21, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JumpingJimmySingh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here JumpingJimmySingh (talk) 5:26 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

You were blocked for WP:COI editing but your unblock request does not address that. RegentsPark (comment) 22:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is no evidence that I've logged in and made edits from various accounts.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JumpingJimmySingh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here JumpingJimmySingh (talk) 22:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Having checked the relevant editing history I find your claim to have no involvement with the organisation totally implausible. I have no idea why you didn't tell the truth about your involvement in the first place, but the more you dig yourself into the hole you have created by making further denials, instead of being open, the less likely it is that you will ever be unblocked. JBW (talk) 21:58, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

as previously stated, I am an observer of British Indians and have no position within the 1928 Institute/India League. I have no COI, everything which I have written in the India League's talk page is demonstrably true

JumpingJimmySingh (talk) 22:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is 1928 Institute. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC)