Julia Domna Ba'al

Archive

[1]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Julia Domna Ba'al! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Board deciding notability, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Severan Dynasty

I've requested semi-protection at WP:RfPP for Caracalla. I know the IP has been active at Julia Domna's article, but it's already protected. Do you know if they've been active on any other articles? It's hard to keep track of them because the IP shifts with every edit, so I can't check their contributions log. Mr rnddude (talk) 18:35, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, Julia Maesa and Septimius Severus. Not same IP but they're all from Iran and talk exactly the same way. Julia Domna Ba'al (talk) 18:42, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, noted at RfPP for reviewing admins to check over. Mr rnddude (talk) 18:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Mr rnddude, the protection could've been higher, since Caracalla is still being vandalized. Julia Domna Ba'al (talk) 02:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Mr rnddude hi. The same user is now editing Papinian with the exact same things about Domna. Is there a more efficient way than to manually revert and lock articles? At this point I'm thinking I should just fix his grammar and add sources (what he's saying is not wrong, just irrelevant and unsourced) to get it over with. Julia Domna Ba'al (talk) 11:50, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

The only way I know of to block a shifting IP editor is to effect a range-block. I don't know anything about range-blocks or how they are calculated except that they are used sparingly in exceptional circumstances. Mr rnddude (talk) 12:45, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Caracalla

You can't invent new origins to historical figures. Rake your arabization and leave. Syrians are Phoenicians and Libyans are Amazigh. Alex.nezz (talk) 02:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Caracalla's father descends from Phoenicians and his mother descends from Arabs. If you disagree that's fine, but the content of Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, not personal opinions. I will stop reverting your disruptive, nationalistically driven, sourceless, and frankly arrogant, editing, but your opinion will not remain on the page since it is not what any reliable source says. If you object then the correct procedure is to go to the article's "talk" section, and present an argument. You called Arabs dirty, insult throughout edit summaries, and on top of it have no clue about the topic you're editing on and don't know how wikipedia works. Julia Domna Ba'al (talk) 02:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

technically, we don't know that - he could have just as easily been a Roman colonist descended from many generations in Roman Africa - all of this is speculation HammerFilmFan (talk) 15:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Stop following me around. All of this is what the sources say, which is what wikipedia cares about. If you want to talk about actual history we would do that on another platform. Julia Domna Ba'al (talk) 16:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

oct 2020

Please read wp:indent.Slatersteven (talk) 13:51, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)