Reverting your edits

edit

Hello, Judokos. Could you please reverting your edits related to Warner Bros.? Because you uploaded PNG version of the logo, contrary to placing of SVG logos on infobox. Beside this, the PNG logo you uploaded is low-quality. 36.77.66.183 (talk) 13:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

RTL Studios moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to RTL Studios. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Toontown (city) moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Toontown (city). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Toontown (city) (July 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Judokos! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

Could you please restore the 2023 Warner Bros. logo at Warner Bros. page? Your edit may be confused as they currently use the new 2023 logo for the corporate purposes. Your edit may be refer to the on-screen ones. https://www.designweek.co.uk/issues/09-may-12-may-2023/chermayeff-geismar-haviv-warner-bros/ Also, you could please the new 2023 logo at Warner Bros. Discovery subsection of the page. 180.254.169.46 (talk) 23:54, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

But the 2019 logo is still used on the official Warner Bros. website [1] and the 2019 Warner Bros. logo is still see on social media https://twitter.com/wbpictures and YouTube, for example at Warner Bros. Pictures. [2] In addition, the 2019 Warner Bros. logo is also used, for example in the Barbie Movie or Meg 2: The Trench and also Wonka according to the Trailer. If the 2023 logo was officially the new logo, it would have been changed by now. So I wouldn't say that the 2019 logo is already being changed to the 2023 Warner Bros. logo. Judokos (talk) 09:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Me & Mickey (TV series) moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Me & Mickey (TV series). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul Vaurie (talk) 16:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Judokos. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 10:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Judokos (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry for causing trouble here on Wikipedia. I realized that my article edits were wrong or only partially correct, but thought they were correct.

For example, Universal Pictures. Since Universal never appears in public as Universal City Studios, but either as Universal Studios or Universal Pictures, I thought this Name to be at the beginning of the article. But I learned that articles always have their legal names and in this case that is Universal City Studios.
I have realized my mistake and now want to behave and only edit articles, which is why I am asking for another chance. Judokos (talk) 07:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Articles do not always use legal names, see WP:COMMONNAME- but the stated reason for the block is sock puppetry, which you do not discuss here. 331dot (talk) 09:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Judokos (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ah OK. With Universal, I just listed another problem that concerns me. Then I promise not to do sock puppetry anymore. I just thought I was really smart and i was not that I could get around a ban with multiple accounts, but that's not the way to do it and now I understand it. I'm sorry I tried to trick the administrators with this. Judokos (talk) 08:21, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

It was indeed not "really smart". Your best bet is to go six months with zero block evasion, then apply under WP:SO. If instead you had not set up multiple accounts to get around your block and continue editing in the manner which got you blocked initially, your block would already have expired. Yamla (talk) 10:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:RTL Studios

edit

  Hello, Judokos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:RTL Studios, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:RTL Studios

edit
 

Hello, Judokos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "RTL Studios".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply