Welcome!

Hello, Juda15! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug Weller (talk) 09:11, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your edits edit

Sorry to have done this, but your edits didn't meet our guidelines and policies. Please read WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. We never use our own articles as sources. They change from time to time and in any case fail our criteria at WP:RS. You also used a personal website by someone unqualified in biblical studies (he says he has a Masters in Library Sciences) and who is a Creationist to make a statement of fact. That both fails our criteria and for the specific text you added is something we can't state as a fact. I'm afraid Wikipedia has a steep learning curve in some instanced. Doug Weller (talk) 09:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

As I said, you need to read WP:RS. But that's just a start. It isn't the sort of thing that should be worded as though it were a fact, so it should probably be attributed to the author. The author should probably be someone respected in his/her field. You need to read WP:NPOV also - if there are different opinions, they need to be shown proportionately to their 'significance' - which basically means the more reliable sources have mentioned an opinion, the more significance it has. At least as a rule of thumb. Then there's what we call original research, see WP:NOR - our articles are based on what reliable sources say about a subject, not our own research or observations. For some subjects this is simple, for the one you are writing about, it isn't. Doug Weller (talk) 20:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
can't really comment on the article other than to say that too many of our articles don't meet our guidelines and policies. Doug Weller (talk) 07:59, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Juda15, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure! edit

The
Adventure
 

Hi Juda15!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)Reply