I have noticed this edit. It is not written from a neutral point of view and contains unsourced claims. Specifically, the claim that P2P *"makes it easier for hackers that use existing P2P networks to steal personal data from the user's PC*" is completely unsourced. The article you linked with does not explain that. In fact, you will have a hard time finding an actual technical explanation, because the claim is simply false. Another claim *"the risks of using peer-to-peer include making it easier for spyware, malware and adware to be transmitted to the user's computer" is also unsourced. Not surprising, because it is also false. If such a risk existed, it would be mentionned in the Peer-to-Peer article.
I'll remove the unsourced claims and tidy up the rest of the article. Please do not add them back unless you can find a credible source, in which case you should consider adding them directly to the Peer-to-Peer article. Thanks -- Marcus1979 (talk) 09:48, 19 November 2011 (UTC)