Jtflood1976
Date Issues edit
Someone is just going to revert those. The BC/BCE thing is an OLD issue on that page. Just so you know. - Vedexent 20:03, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
You cannot change category names to BCE - Wikipedia treats "Category 50 BC" and "Category 50BCE" as seperate categories - and the BCE ones do not exist. Changing the names breaks the pages. - Vedexent 21:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Simply put, it is a humorous and illuminating comment by a scientist, trying to educate the general public on the relative numbers of species. Considering that the quote has been in the article for over three years, your enthusiastic opposition, without discussion other than snideness, is perhaps more revealing than you'd like, if you will pause to reconsider. Please do. Shenme 22:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Would the David Attenborough quote add to the article? Would it reveal something in a useful and accessible way to the average reader? More importantly, would it be more revealing about David Attenborough, you, or beetles?
- It is far too easy to say "I should not have to read about" when you are reading from a particular position. In fact, what struck me later, after my comment to you, and then your comment on the talk page, is that I'm not sure that the text you dislike is even 'religious'. I don't see where at J. B. S. Haldane it mentions him jawing on about religion. I can't help but read the text you object to as a witty response to a framed question. And wit that would help the article, reinforcing the disproportionate number of species. I'm sorry, but I think you damage the article through pushing an agenda. Please reconsider. Shenme 23:17, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Oops, Lotus QuickPlace edit
After moving to IBM Lotus QuickPlace, saw the history of your move to QuickPlace. I was looking at the IBM Software category and making the nameing of IBM products consistent. The QuickPlace article begins with "IBM QuickPlace" thus my edit. I think only the original Lotus products, such as 1-2-3, are left without the IBM prefix. Anyway, if you want to change it back I won't touch it again (and I'll at least glance at history before making similar changes). With apologies, tooold 11:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DB.png edit
Thanks for uploading Image:DB.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Navarre.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)