Jsrouthier

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse Talbot has been accepted

Jesse Talbot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 08:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Above: Algorithm generated boilerplate (of course). Here: An actual human (or reasonable imitation thereof). Your Jesse Talbot is about the best draft I've ever seen; certainly it's the best I've seen since I restarted looking through drafts a couple of weeks ago. Well done, and please stick around and, time permitting, consider creating more. -- Hoary (talk) 08:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much! I am very thrilled to be a new contributor. Jsrouthier (talk) 12:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

However, be careful when citing yourself. I think that you did so properly; but later, if you somehow find yourself in a content dispute in which the other editor is (editors are) citing unrelated authors and you are citing yourself, you may get into trouble. -- Hoary (talk) 22:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

I appreciate that guidance and the link; thank you. It is tricky because almost no one else has written about him at all. I do have additional primary-source documentation in my peer-reviewed article that I can go back to if questions arise. Jsrouthier (talk) 23:14, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Ah, but primary sources too are problematic. (By this point, you might reasonably be wondering why you got yourself into this jungle of policies, guidelines, obsessives, kibitzing ignoramuses, and worse....) Hoary (talk) 01:36, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Hewitt (artist) has been accepted

Charlie Hewitt (artist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 22:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)