Jsg10lion
Request for mediation rejected
editThe request for formal mediation concerning Bhagat Singh, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 14:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
January 2015
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bhagat Singh has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bhagat Singh was changed by Jsg10lion (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873585 on 2015-01-26T13:28:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
February 2015
editPlease stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Bhagat Singh. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN talk to me 14:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- What constitutes unsourced content please?
- The issue in question (Sikh vs atheist) has been discussed to death on the article talk page. If you persist in disrupting the process of consensus as you have been doing then the only outcome will be an enforcement of sanctions as notified below. Please be careful. - Sitush (talk) 00:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- This issue has been discussed but NOT resolved. I have presented evidences to make the article in question accurate but this is being dismissed without proper grounds. The evidences I have presented has greater gravitas than the one piece of uncorroborated evidence that it refutes. I have made a number of presentations to answer queries raised and I have been met with abuse, threats and irrational counter arguments. I don't mean to disrupt the process and indeed I have tred to engage the processes to resolve this to no success. My main objective is to ensure this article is accurate and subverted and I will continue to do this. As always I am open to rationale debate.
March 2015
editYou may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bhagat Singh. Abecedare (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Your recent edits
editHello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)