Your submission at Articles for creation: The Fragrance Shop (April 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Jscroggie1983! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 15:34, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Block appeal

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jscroggie1983 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have attempted to add an article, made one edit, and now am blocked. I am unaffiliated with the brand, and it is not intended to be advertorial in nature. I believe that not only that this is subjective, but now I cannot rectify the issue by being able to edit my draft. I fully understand the need to remove web spam, but I do not understand or agree with the block of my account. I would like to edit the article so it is NOT advertorial in any way. Jscroggie1983 (talk) 16:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Declined per your comment below. —SpacemanSpiff 06:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would be willing to discuss an unblock under the condition you do not edit about The Fragrance Shop. There is much work to be done in building the world's largest free content encyclopedia. See Wikipedia:Community portal for more information. What edits can you make to improve WIkipedia?--Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:34, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request

edit

I would be happy for that to be the case if it were possible to submit an requested article for The Fragrance Shop under companies. I was not aware this was possible previously. I can provide a neutral editor numerous notable and verifiable links to third parties to aid with this. As I mention, in no way was it my intent for my initial post to be advertorial in nature. Jscroggie1983 (talk) 21:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

We have here well over five million articles in print, and an uncountable number still to be written. Given your statement that you are not affiliated to the brand, why is it so important to you to create this article? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:02, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

I did a search in Google about the brand having been shopping on their site, and wanted to do a bit more digging into the business before i made a purchase. When i did the search, on the right hand side, there was information about The Perfume Shop, not The Fragrance Shop, which are two different businesses. The detail provided by Google was provided by Wikipedia so i did a search on Wiki for The Fragrance Shop and found no page. I understand having found out more information about the business now, that The Fragrance Shop is the largest independent retailer in the UK, bigger than The Perfume Shop, and given that Google is giving incorrect information for The Fragrance Shop, information about The Perfume Shop provided by Wikipedia, i thought it made sense to try and add the information i found. I found quite a lot of information in legitimate publications, the CEO interviewed by the BBC, reports in SKY News about them going public this year. I see no reason why they should not be included! If it is this hard to publish an article on Wiki, i'd be more than happy for it to be written by someone else. I just don't see why it shouldn't be there. Jscroggie1983 (talk) 07:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on the edit above from --Dlohcierekim --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:27, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Reviewing admin: Draft:The Fragrance Shop has since been recreated by User:FragranceFanatic and subsequently deleted as spam. MER-C 10:30, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Given that you aren't interested in the proposed unblock condition and continue to advocate for the same article, I'm inclined to let the block be, and will do so unless Dlohcierekim thinks otherwise. —SpacemanSpiff 06:38, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jscroggie1983 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to request that i am unblocked so i can properly update my personal user profile page and therefore request a neutral third-party update the organisation page in question. There are enough notable sources to validate the request. I was misinformed about the process of getting a page created

Decline reason:

I can think of no other plausible explanation other than undisclosed paid editing or some other conflict of interest, here. So, no. I'm declining your request. Yamla (talk) 15:52, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jscroggie1983 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I only want to be able to properly edit my user profile to correctly confirm my conflict of interest and then request a neutral third party update the page - past that point i do not wish to edit anything else

Decline reason:

You aren't going to be unblocked if all you want to do here is edit about your business, either directly or through a third party. If you want to be a general Wikipedia contributor, you will need to tell us what other subjects you are interested in editing in. Since it seems that you are only interested in editing about The Fragrance Shop, there is no benefit to this project in unblocking you, and I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 09:29, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.