Jqadri

January 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Saman Hasnain because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 06:26, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saman Hasnain. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our

help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.

• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Saman Hasnain was changed by Jqadri (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960217 on 2015-01-03T06:35:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:35, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. VViking_TalkEdits 07:12, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Edit Warring

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. VViking_TalkEdits 07:26, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Saman Hasnain. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. VViking_TalkEdits 08:04, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

If you are referring to this [1] lawsuit, it was dismissed before it even went to trial. There was no judgement in Hasnain's favour, and it certainly does not show that the charges against hime and his wife are "false". The only way that will happen is if the authorities withdraw the charges or the Hasnains return to face the charges and they are found not guilty. Harry the Dog WOOF 08:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Lawsuit was dismissed due to non appearance due to medical condition and not based on merit

Law is if no answer filed in 30 days there is automatic default

So we are reopening the case

Joe Hasnsin is filing his own lawsuit against all the culprits including u

There will be several articles published on Google in the next few months through other sources so tampering with Wilipedia will not satisfy your or your superiors evil agenda

There are a lot of ways to reveal the truth to the world and it will happen

There is about 500 pages of evidence that will be published

The case was dismissed because Hasnain failed to file the moving papers that the court required. Nor did he attend the the pre-trial case management conference (probably because he would have been arrested if he did so). People are not required to file a defence in a vexatious case. The judgement is not "automatic" if no defence is filed. There is still a hearing if a judge feels the case has merit. If he feels it has no merit, it will be dismissed - as it was in this case. Harry the Dog WOOF 09:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Plz refer to my email that I sent to Wikipedia With legal content about this page U should send this warning to the other editor who is breaking the law

Unfortunately I do not have access to this e-mail since I am an editor just like you. Please read our guidelines, also saying people should be criminally prosecuted or saying editors are breaking the law will also very quickly lead you to being blocked from editing. There are many other editors who have reverted your information, please utilize the talk page. VViking_TalkEdits 08:08, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Saman Hasnain. Harry the Dog WOOF 09:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:35, 3 January 2015 (UTC)