Welcome edit

Hello Jpark3909, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! Alphachimp talk 00:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting help
Getting along
Getting technical
 

Hot Spring Fever edit

I don't think it's the name of the hot spring Raj and Samson went in. That's just the name of the episode. Squirepants101 20:25, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

your contributions edit

Hello Jpark3909.

Please stop adding arbitrary content to WP:FA and Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests. Indeed, these pages are used for listing Featured articles only, not any other articles. If you can think an article can be promoted to featured, please submit it for review. Thanks, Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 01:08, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Again, please ensure that articles you add to Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests are actually featured. Thanks. -- Steel 21:18, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Zombies in gaming edit

Thanks for your attempts at cutting the page back, but the content you're deleting from the Zombie page also includes board and card games, which aren't covered by the "Zombies in computer and video games" link. --McGeddon 09:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Samson J. Clogmeyer edit

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia! Your test worked, and thank you for reverting or removing it yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start. Again, welcome, and I hope that you will like Wikipedia. Squirepants101 14:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

One Krab's Trash edit

Is it really necessary to use the word "fuck" in an article geared for children? Please use a better word, and familiarize yourself with [[WP:Profanity}}. Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 02:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Gangster edit

I reverted your recent addition, as it did not seem to belong there. If you can explain why you added it, I might understand better. --ArmadilloFromHell 05:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Zombie (Doom 3) edit

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Zombie (Doom 3), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at Talk:Zombie (Doom 3). If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~ BigrTex 16:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Fairly OddParents edit

Your edits to The Fairly OddParents have been reverted.

The series is not over yet, there have been many online petitions to save the show (including my own), the ratings are high, and Butch Hartman has announced the production of new episodes for FOP. Marcus2 14:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Requesting Bans edit

I noticed on MartinBot's page you had asked about this. Since MartinBot is just a bot, I'll fill you in. To request a ban, see Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism and use one of the following in the User-Reported section (don't use a ==header==), whichever would apply:

{{IPvandal|IP address here}} for IP vandalism.

{{Vandal|Username here}} for registered users.

Just to show, that vandal one, for instance, would appear as Username here (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Once one of those is there and the user's IP or username is filled in, give a brief description of what's going on and sign your request. (~~~~)

As it says there, "Make sure the person is active now, has received a proper set of warnings, and has vandalized after a recent last warning, except in unusual circumstances". Have a nice day--anything else, post it on my talk. C. Foultz 16:54, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Greetings from WikiProject Korea! edit

 

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Korea-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Korea? It's a group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Korea-related articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Wikimachine 03:33, 29 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Inaccuracies in eBay edit

Hi. I've reverted your edit to eBay in which you state "Cho Seung Hui, the perpetrator of the Virginia Tech massacre purchased a Walther P22 from eBay". This is simply untrue, as the source you cite makes clear; eBay years ago banned the sale of weapons and ammo -- what Cho bought on eBay were empty clips (the sale of which have since been banned). --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 00:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Doraemon (1979 anime) edit

 

A tag has been placed on Doraemon (1979 anime), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Plrk (talk) 13:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

P.S. I deleted this as it was unintelligible, but seemed to refer to the subject of an existing article-- Doraemon. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 13:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


 
Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 week. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Infrogmation (talk) 15:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

{{unblock|Hello. I recently checked my contributions and the last edit I made seem to be unfamiliar. I believe my account has been hacked because to be honest, I have never made any edits to Atlantic Records. I'm not sure how this happened, but I believe my account has been hacked.}}

{{unblock|Actually I request that my account gets blocked indefinitely once the current block expires. I'll be starting to make a new account with a stronger password.}} In that case it is likely that unless you have a way of confirming your identity, your account will probably be blocked indefinitely per WP:GOTHACKED. Thank you for letting us know about it. (Retracting my comment, mostly based on Luna's comment, although I do think the possible compromise is troubling. Templarion (talk) 06:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Let's not be ridiculous. An otherwise perfectly helpful editor, active since 2006, makes one iffy edit which is reverted within seconds, and we show them the door without any warning? I see no reason why this account should be blocked at all, much less indefinitely. – Luna Santin (talk) 08:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • I have no objection to removing the block as the generally good user has requested it, but I have not unblocked as there seems to be a problem with the account being compromised? I will be off line for a some hours; in the meanwhile if Luna Santin or another admin can figure this out they have my support to do what they think appropriate. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • I'm going to simply lift the block. Jpark: You almost certainly have not lost control of your password, but changing your password might be prudent just in case. (If you can still log in you haven't really lost control.) Chances are high that you simply left yourself logged in somewhere and someone vandalized Wikipedia under your login. I figure, on the off chance I'm wrong, you can be swiftly re-blocked if it becomes apparent a vandal is still using your account. But Luna's right.. after a long positive history, a flat-out block of a week for one inappropriate edit is a bit much in the first place. Mangojuicetalk 17:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
    • Okay, looks like you didn't log out somewhere or some similar problem. Changing your password would be a good idea if you haven't already done so, and probably will take care of any potential additional problem. To be cautious, it might be a good idea to check your own user contributions for the next couple days to make sure they're all edits you've made; notify an admin if a problem persists. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Haeundae (film) edit

I never said it was vandalism, only that the text you added didn't make any sense. What does "having a job" have to do with him breaking into tears over his mother's death? PC78 (talk) 13:58, 23 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

No worries; "rv" usually means revert, while "rvv" mean revert vandalism. I can't really help you with Running Turtle because I haven't seen the film. PC78 (talk) 16:15, 23 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Running Turtle edit

Hello, you sent me a request in needing help on Running Turtle. I haven't seen it, but I am good with research so how may I help? Colleen16 04:05, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I am watching it now, but I would think so, yes. By research. Hey it stars the same actor from The Chaser (film). Colleen16 (talk) 04:26, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. In Blood, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Korean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library! edit

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
 
Hi Jpark3909! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 20:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Jpark3909. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Jpark3909. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Spike and Tyke (characters) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spike and Tyke (characters) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spike and Tyke (characters) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:17, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 19 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited List of ethnic slurs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply