JpSears12345

Welcome!

Hi JpSears12345! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sex industry, did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

I also reverted your edit to Ideological bias on Wikipedia. Despite your edit summary, you removed content sourced to the Guardian's news reporting. You also removed content sourced to Wired and the New York Times, leaving an unsourced remnant. • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop

Please stop your tendentious editing and your destructive removal of sourced text from articles. Thank you. Bishonen | tålk 21:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC).

June 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 08:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

• So, you certainly did not stop.[1]. Bishonen | tålk 08:13, 7 June 2021 (UTC).

Hi JpSears12345! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at 2017 that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Also, stripping sourced context as "unnecessary opinion" also misrepresents the act as uncontroversial. • Gene93k (talk) 06:09, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at 2017, you may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 16:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC) Hello I've done nothing wrong. I simply changed criticsism to debate because it was not one sided. Why is this a problem?

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2017. Notfrompedro (talk) 17:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC) How is changing criticism to debate biased..... and how is it disruptive.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 17:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Substance dependence, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Trump–Raffensperger phone call. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)