Josfitt
Diplomatic missions edit
editThe page is for "diplomatic missions." A liaison office is a diplomatic mission. Using your logic, you should delete all the consulates general and consulates because they're not embassies. - ILBobby (talk) 14:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Once again, you've reverted my edit for a non-existent reason. Why isn't it on the List of diplomatic missions in Egypt page? Because I didn't think to put it there. That's the only reason. Citing that as a reason for an edit being factually wrong is asinine. I would suggest you read more about what you're editing before you make edits based on nothing than your own opinion. - ILBobby (talk) 05:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Your revert on the R train article
editLook at my new image more carefully before jumping to conclusions. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 22:45, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
As a matter of fact, whatever...I mean you're gonna keep on reverting it anyway... JoesphBarbaro (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
editPlease do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Template:North american major league sports player associations, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Hirolovesswords (talk) 01:43, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Not quite sure why the symbol 'should' be shown in red. On the Soviet flag it appeared in yellow. Also, I agree that the Soviets weren't the only ones using this symbol, but they were the first ones as it was invented in 1918. --Whydoesitfeelsogood (talk) 04:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC) But look at Star and Crescent. The Islamic color is green. There is nothing wrong with it. So let us leave this as red. The Communist color is always red. So what is wrong with this here. Josfitt (talk) 12:17, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
August 2015
editHi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Major League Soccer does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Please stop changing to a generic infobox. It's losing information:
- International cup(s)
- Current MLS Cup
- Current Supporters' Shield
- Most MLS Cups
- Most Supporters' Shields
- TV partners
It's disruptive and bad editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Major League Baseball may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- }}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Why did you revert my change? The new image is far superior. Epic Genius (talk) 12:36, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- I understand you're reverting it because the R62As are being displaced from the 7. However, they haven't been displaced yet. Anyway, there was a pre-existing picture of R62As on the 7, but it was low-quality and had a timestamp on it, which is discouraged per WP:WATERMARK. Epic Genius (talk) 21:57, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Okay I accept. Let us wait until about next year when the R62As are fully displaced from the 7 Line. But as I have told you more and more R62As are being sent to Pelham on the 6 Line. So I agree by next year you can change it. So I accept this but the R62As will still be displaced from the 7 Line anyway next year. Josfitt (talk) 21:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- We will change it then. However, the R62As are still on the 7 train, so we should still have a picture for them (I guess per @JoesphBarbaro's reasoning more than anything else). So no hard feelings. . Epic Genius (talk) 03:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Maybe you are correct. So maybe next year after all of the R62As are displaced, then we can change it.Josfitt (talk) 11:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Cuba-Philippines relations, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Cuba–Philippines relations. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 25
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sunnyside, Queens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Koov (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC) |
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Josfitt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)