JosephFrontroyal, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi JosephFrontroyal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Theresa May may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ], Secretary from 2014 to 2016, were appointed [[Secretary of State for International Trade]] and [[Chancellor of the Exchequer|Chancellor\\ respectively.<ref>http://www.wsj.com/articles/theresa-may-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:31, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 20 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Clarke. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 20 July edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Michael J. Pence edit

 

The article Michael J. Pence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable - notability is not inherited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 06:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mansur Selum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Union Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have corrected the link from "Democratic Union Party" to "Democratic Union Party (Syria)." Thank you for the notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.53.31 (talk) 10:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Traditionalist Workers Party (TWP) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Traditionalist Workers Party (TWP) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —0xF8E8 (talk) 05:09, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 24 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Campaign song, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Snake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Commonwealth of Poland and Germany for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Commonwealth of Poland and Germany is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commonwealth of Poland and Germany until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

October 2016 edit

  Your recent edit to Evan McMullin presidential campaign, 2016 appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ileana Wechtel edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ileana Wechtel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 01:06, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ileana Wachtel edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ileana Wachtel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 01:25, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

This page was mistitled "Ileana Wechtel" rather than "Ileana Wachtel" with an "a" in the last name. As for the page's relevance, Wachtel is the third-most important individual with two of the most influence PAC backing a major third-party candidate. I'll leave this message again in the link you provided.

Speedy deletion nomination of Yves Christen (biologist) edit

Hello JosephFrontroyal,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Yves Christen (biologist) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. en:User:Rtrust (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Yaroslav Nilov edit

Hello JosephFrontroyal,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Yaroslav Nilov for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. en:User:Rtrust (talk) 03:36, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Yaroslav Nilov edit

Hello JosephFrontroyal,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Yaroslav Nilov for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. en:User:Rtrust (talk) 03:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Ad Orientem. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Dark Enlightenment without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

The section had been marked as using a unreliable source for over a month. No additions were made to the section, so I removed it.

I am seeing two sources cited for that section. Are you asserting that both are not RS? I do think that section is a bit clunky and it seems to substantially repeat what is at the top, which is better sourced. That said, both Dreher and Davis are highly regarded figures in the world of conservative thought and I would take a deep breath before saying either was inherently non-RS especially when opining on these kinds of subjects. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
In that case, the section ought to be on the alt-right page. Putting it with Neoreaction does seem a bit disjointed. Good luck though, that page is monitored very poorly. It reads like an opinion piece, and biased against at that.
After thinking about it, I don't think it adds much to the article and I have removed it. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:08, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, JosephFrontroyal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 23 December edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Joel Searby edit

 

The article Joel Searby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:POLITICIAN, WP:GNG or any other part of WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 22:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Robert Schlegel) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Robert Schlegel, JosephFrontroyal!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Are you able to look this over and address the improvement tags? Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 22:26, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Chris Ashby) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Chris Ashby, JosephFrontroyal!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Are you able to look this over and address the improvement tags? Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 22:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Cossack songs) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Cossack songs, JosephFrontroyal!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Are you able to look this over and address the improvement tags? Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 22:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hans-Dietrich Sander edit

 

The article Hans-Dietrich Sander has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 22:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pierre Vial (politician) edit

Hello, JosephFrontroyal. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Pierre Vial (politician), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Pierre Vial (politician) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 23:34, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, JosephFrontroyal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Star-Spangled Crown for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Star-Spangled Crown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star-Spangled Crown until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 06:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hans-Dietrich Sander for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hans-Dietrich Sander is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans-Dietrich Sander until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 07:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chris Ashby for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Ashby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Ashby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 19:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply