Vandalism to User:BorgQueen - warning edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User:BorgQueen, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. BorgQueen (talk) 02:16, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

April 2009 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Joseph Priestley House has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): geocities\.com (links: http://geocities.com/josecruiselines/josecruiselines.htm).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

April 2009 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wiki, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wiki was changed by JoseGonzalez66 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-04-21T20:27:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was changed by JoseGonzalez66 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-04-21T20:29:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:29, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with File:Cruise.png edit

Thanks for uploading File:Cruise.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Jose Cruise Lines edit

 

The article Jose Cruise Lines has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:33, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Last warning edit

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Account blocked edit

 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Jose Homepage edit

Re your message: Sorry, but I will not be restoring your user page as it was a blatant advertisement for your "cruise line". See Wikipedia:User page for proper usage of your user page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:46, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re your message: I have restored your user page, but please note that Wikipedia is not to be used to advertise your company. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:34, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Re your message: I have deleted your user page per your request. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Jose Cruise Lines edit

I have deleted the article about your "cruise line" again. Please do not recreate the article. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

May 2009 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Gogo Dodo, you will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Indef blocked edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for spamming and disruptive editing. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--BorgQueen (talk) 22:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply