Speedy deletion of Radio Noize edit

 

A tag has been placed on Radio Noize requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Merenta 19:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: Radio Noize edit

First of all, I didn't mark the article for deletion, so I'm not sure my you left me a message.

The article in question has zero references - nothing to show why it should have an article. Saying other stuff exists is not a good reason according to many Wikipedians. Radio Noize could very well deserve an article, but I'm afraid it has to establish notability in order for it not to get deleted. I don't know anything about this subject or I would help you out. Also, please remember to sign your posts by typing ~~~~. Thanks. Rocket000 19:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove the deletion notice, since you are the article's creator. You can add {{hangon}} though. Rocket000 19:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply