User talk:Jonny-mt/Archive 9
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
For help
Hello! The administor VS asked me to note to other Admins. It happened that I found you and I invite you help to solve the dispute/problem about the article Gaogouli County if you are interested and have time. Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&oldid=240660700. Thanks! -Dicting (talk) 12:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Hawaiʻi WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VII - October 2008
Aloha. The October 2008 issue of the Hawaiʻi WikiProject newsletter has been published. To change your delivery options or unsubscribe, visit this link. Mahalo nui loa. WikiProject Hawaiʻi 17:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
AAU reminder notice
Hey there Jonny-mt! This is a friendly reminder to update your status at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User/Adoptee's Area/Adopters whenever it is appropriate in order to provide new users with the most up-to-date information on available adopters. Also please note that we will be removing adopters who have not edited in 60 days. If you become active again (and we hope you do!) please feel free to re-add yourself. Cheers! |
- Notice delivery by xenobot 14:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Looking for advice
Hi Jonny,
またアドバイスを聞きたいんですが。。。
I have been reverted several times by two editors that team-up against me, since it is written in one of their talk pages to team up together to go against my opinion. One of the editors is removing the whole "see also" section of an article, and I am simply against it. The proof is there, in their talk page and in all the edits when I am constantly asking to talk about it. What would you suggest to do?
宜しくお願いします。, Miguel.mateo (talk) 14:47, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Copied your CSD explanation page
I have found your CSD explanation page through another admin. I must give you kudos on it and wanted you to now I have copied it to my user space (with attributions of course) for CSD work. Hope you don't mind. ありがとうございました. (from an old 囲碁 player) -- Alexf(talk) 18:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Not at all; please have at it! I'm just glad you found it useful. --jonny-mt 03:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Your CSD page
May I please use your brilliant essay [1], I am worn out trying to explain. Thanks.— Ѕandahl ♥ 01:24, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
- I'm glad you could make good use of it. Enjoy! --jonny-mt 02:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Hawaiʻi WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VIII - November 2008
Aloha. The November 2008 issue of the Hawaiʻi WikiProject newsletter has been published. To change your delivery options or unsubscribe, visit this link. Mahalo nui loa. WikiProject Hawaiʻi 06:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Heroes Bob.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Heroes Bob.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:32, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Schedule (construction) discussion
Sorry to be late to the discussion, I do not check the Wikipedia discussion page often. The two responses to your discussion are misinformed, uninformed, unqualified or all three. The link to Primavera is logical for the following reason, it is the most commonly used construction scheduling software. The topic of "encyclopedic usage for "schedule" in the context of construction" seems obvious. If you would like me to explain why, just let me know. My suggestion would have been to redirect to a project management scheduling article or develop a scheduling page dedicated to construction schedules. Though the Primavera link accomplished this with a construction specific link that covered all the same topics and issues. It is not if there is a page dedicated to construction schedules but when it is written, hopefully by someone other than me. Sorry for my late response, what do we do now?Granite07 (talk) 20:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
A request to renew my wiki page
I understand Wikipedia's need to monitor and sift through non-encyclopedic articles, and delete them if necessary. I recently attempted to create a page on a missionary named Todd Will and it was deleted. I understand that it was probably deleted because I did not have adequate information on Todd at the time. I intended to create the page and add information as I received it but I did not have time before it was deleted. I am asking to either, a) get my site back to add to it as my team receives information, or b) receive information on how to keep the site up long enough to add the information that we do have. I appreciate your response as promptly as possible. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Basketcase1017 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
As one of the deleting admins...
Could you take a look at the Ed Ludbrook article (Deleted July 18, 2008 and July 21, 2008) and compare it to the Edward Ludbrook article (Created August 3, 2008) to see if they are the same. And also compare it to User:EdLudbrook (Which is the same as Edward Ludbrook) for the heck of it. Thanks. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Casserly article
Hi:
The reason I'm undoing entries in the Charley Casserly article is that the other person is quite biased. That person is deleted text that is totally supported by footnotes. Please read the text being deleted by the other person before you pass judgment. If Wikipedia is going to be an unbiased source of facts, it needs to be objective. The other person is writing information that is not only slanted in Casserly's favor, but is just plain not true. Please feel free to contact me if you wish to discuss further.
I would also mention that the other person has ignored repeated warnings from other Wikipedia moderators against deleting text supported by footnotes.
Respectfully,
Carlos Escobar —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlosescobar (talk • contribs) 03:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism alert
You have been paged because a user has reported a high level of vandalism and you are listed as a contact.
This is an automatically generated message. If problems occur, please contact User:nathanww. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The King's a-poopin' (talk • contribs) 12:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Got room for an adoptee?
Hi jonny-mt, I'm a novice at Wikipedia editing and was wondering if you would be willing to show me the ropes. My current interests are translating articles from the Korean Wikipedia to the English Wikipedia and adding Korean script to current Wikipedia articles. I would also like my adopter to "look over my shoulder" -- review my edits to make sure that I'm not messing anything up too badly :) Anyway, if you would be willing to help me out please let me know. Daram.G (talk) 13:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of File:Mg planetoid.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Mg planetoid.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.
If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 19:45, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Mg planetoid.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mg planetoid.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 03:59, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
New image project
Hi. This little form letter is just a courtesy notice to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images, Wikipedia:WikiProject Fair use, Wikipedia:WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration into the newly formed Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media has met with general support at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Conversation about redirecting those projects is located here. Please participate in that discussion if you have any interest, and if you still have interest in achieving the goals of the original project, we'd love to have you join in. If you aren't interested in either the conversation or the project, please pardon the interruption. :) Thanks. Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Audi Navigation+
Hi, my name is Nikos, I live in Greece. I happen to run into article Audi Navigation+ in Deletionpedia and just wanted you to know how extremely helpful it was.
I managed to distinguish between different products of Audi, named all "Navigation", understand the differences, match the products and the car models that are designed for and to finally decide what should my forthcoming car be fitted with.
I urge you to reconsider bringing this article back to life, since it definitely will (and I'm sure already did) help others as well.
Thanks,
Nikos —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.62.109.163 (talk) 14:01, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
WikiBirthday
I saw from here that it's been exactly three years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 14:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
CSD Page
Jonny-mt, Syed Kazim has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I used your CSD page. Thanks for creating such a wonderful page! --Syed Kazim | Talk 20:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Rachel Marsden
Concerning this article and its talk page: in May, 2008 they were both semiprotected by you and viridae (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). I've proposed that they should both be unprotected and watched with great vigilance to see if the problem has gone away. --TS 22:59, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I understand your concern that my external links may have been spam, but I wanted to assure you that they were not intended as such -- my thinking was that they were of specific interest to viewers interested in those specific topics. (Some were posted while I was not logged in, because for a while I couldn't remember my Wikipedia logon password; they were all posted by me, not by a bot or automated service.) If you feel they were inappropriate based on Wikipedia policy, I won't argue or protest their deletion, but your accusation has caused me considerable trouble with other services accusing me of being a spammer. I apologize for the misunderstanding regarding Wikipedia policy, and I will post no additional links, but I would appreciate it if you would remove the flag proclaiming my external site to be a spam site, which it is not.
Thank you,
Of interest? Climate change denial [2]
Of interest? Climate change denial [3] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.184.230.240 (talk) 23:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC) 99.184.230.240 (talk) 23:34, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Permission to copy, please?
I am frequently explaining why I deleted an article, and I was considering plagiarising copying asking an admin for permission to use one from their talk page. I saw the one that is on User:J.delanoy's page, and I was going to ask him, when I noticed in the small print that it is your creation. Do you mind if I make a copy of it for my talk page? And if you're ok with that, do you mind if I tweek the text a bit to suit my needs? Cheers! Stephen! Coming... 16:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hope you don't mind, but I've taken the liberty to be bold and copied it. Great page! Stephen! Coming... 11:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Jonathan Emile
I will be updating the Jonathan Emile page that you previously deleted in 2008. It should fall within the guidelines. Thanks.Wikiwahwah5 (talk) 21:33, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, IceRocket, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IceRocket (2nd nomination). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Woogee (talk) 00:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
クソ米国へ帰れ!!
お前なんか日本に存在する必要は全くねぇんだよー!! アメリカ人は人間的なごみだ。死ね、死ね、このアメリカヤロー。 アメリカの全滅は不可欠なものだ。 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.2.240.235 (talk) 14:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- 爆笑! このコメント凄過ぎて、とても消す訳にはいかないんだ〜 --jonny-mt 05:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
My Battalion on the Main Page
Hey, if you've got some time could you take a look at the nomination I made for my battalion's page? Palm_Dogg (talk) 21:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Tokyo meetup
Interested in attending a Tokyo Wikipedia Meetup? |
---|
If you are interested in a Tokyo meetup, please visit Wikipedia:Meetup/Tokyo and voice your interest. |
Adoption
Hi Jonny-mt,
I've started to clean up the Adopters' list. You appear to appear to have been editing only sporadically in the last months. I wonder if you're still interested in adopting new users. If you're not interested any more, would you mind removing yourself? Thank you and happy editing, Snowolf How can I help? 11:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Snowolf,
- Thanks for the heads-up; as you point out, I've been a little (a lot) on the inactive side, so I'll go ahead and remove myself. --jonny-mt 12:58, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Rollback question
Hi Jonny - a long time ago you gave me rollback privilege. Now with the new WP it is gone. Is there a way to get it back? Thanks. Makana Chai (talk) 03:28, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Futurama revival
Hello. WikiProject Futurama is being revived. Since you are listed as a participant here, you have received this message to make sure you still are. If you like to help update the WikiProject, please discuss here. Hopefully you can stay with us and continue to work on Futurama-related articles. GamerPro64 (talk) delivered by MuZebot 06:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Restore a deleted page.
Hi, I noticed you deleted the a Team Epic wiki page. It's a legit Canadian show that was picked up on a minor network and I was hoping to add to part of it's development and reception history. I don't know why you deleted it but it has been around for a while and I would like to add some more informative information to the page. If you could restore it that would be great.
Thanks
The page in question.
http://deletionpedia.dbatley.com/w/index.php?title=Team_Epic_%28deleted_30_Apr_2008_at_03:33%29 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Comicfan22 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey there! I am currently proposing more detailed and standardized guidelines for the inclusion of foreign, in particular Japanese titles. I just wanted to ask for some opinions from those who formed the original consensus. I would appreciate it if you came over and provide your opinion on the suggestion. Prime Blue (talk) 20:48, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Invitation to join WikiProject United States
Rollback request
Greetings! I've been a member of Wikipedia since 2004 and very dedicated to the cause, and would like to request the ability to rollback. The rollback page lists you as one who can authorize someone to receive it. Thank you for your consideration. Pastorrussell (talk) 19:56, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Smg powerstar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Smg powerstar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:11, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Help me
{{adminhelp}}
The following page was put up for speedy deletion: Anthony Weiner photo scandal. That page also had a Talk Page (Talk:Anthony Weiner photo scandal), on which editors could object to or support the speedy deletion. When I last read that Talk Page a few moments ago, there were about a dozen people who opposed the speedy deletion ... and perhaps only one person who did not oppose it. Then, an editor named User:Jonny-mt deleted the article. And now, that Talk Page -- and all of its discussion -- is nowhere to be found. Where can I find that Talk Page that was deleted? And, how can he (User:Jonny-mt) delete the page when the opponents to deletion outnumbered the supporters by 12 to 1? What would be the point of having the discussion then, if User:Jonny-mt can ignore and unilaterally override it? Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 06:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC))
- (edit conflict)
- Hi there,
- The short answer is that I speedy deleted the page based on established, rigid criteria. While you are correct there were a number of voices opposing the move, the comments were not based on existing policy and guidelines. Most importantly, none of them addressed the most critical issue--specifically, the articles were virtually word-for-word copies of content that exists elsewhere.
- I hope this helps clarify why I deleted the pages. I only have time for a short response right now, but I'm happy to provide a more detailed response a bit later if you like. (Incidentally, I removed the template above; you got my attention just by writing on my talk page.) --jonny-mt 07:48, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Jonny, I don't think this was A10-able. To quote from policy "where the title is not a plausible redirect". As you yourself created redirects after deletion, it's hard to claim that these weren't plausible redirects. Might I suggest restoring the talk page and article, but leaving the article as a fully protected redirect until consensus develops? Rami R 07:44, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know how plausible those terms are--I set up the redirects more so the current editors wouldn't find themselves staring at an empty page with a deletion log--but I think your suggestion is reasonable. I'll take care of that now. --jonny-mt 07:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Done --jonny-mt 08:19, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Lowellian,
Thanks for your attention on the Anthony Weiner item. However, I strongly disagree with your position--PROD status does not impact whether something is speediable or not. I restored the history and temporarily protected the redirect per a discussion on my talk page, and I wish you had contacted me before undoing my admin actions. --jonny-mt 00:30, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- The PROD template clearly states that "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. However please explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, it should not be replaced." The implication of the template not being replaceable is also that, if the template is removed, the article is not readily deletable without first seeking consensus. Speedy deletion is for uncontroversial deletions, and the deletion of that article was unmistakably controversial, with statements of both support for deletion and opposition to deletion from multiple users. The PROD was disputed and the template removed by another user (User:Wikipedical), so at that point, with no clear consensus to delete, further action to delete the article should have been through AFD. Redirecting the article was an effective unilateral deletion without due process and enforcing that effective no-process deletion by protecting the redirect was an abuse of admin powers, one that you did not reverse even after protest from yet another user (User:Joseph A. Spadaro). The admin action was wrong, and as such, I reversed it and left notes on both Talk:Anthony Weiner and Talk:Anthony Weiner photo scandal. —Lowellian (reply) 01:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- The version of the article I deleted was this one. PROD was removed, but CSD was still there, and I determined that it fell under WP:CSD#A10 (compare this to the original article at the time). Removing a PROD does not impact whether something is speediable by either policy or implication. CSD relies solely on whether or not the admin evaluating the request thinks the article fulfills the criteria as outlined in the policy at that time. I determined that it did, so I deleted the article.
- Following the deletion, I received some additional feedback. I thought the proposed approach was sensible, so I did it. Then you undid part of it. I don't object to that, but I would have appreciated you contacting me first.
- That being said, I do object to your accusation that I "abused" the tools. When you protect a page you're editing, you abuse the tools. When you block someone you're in a conflict with, you abuse the tools. When you delete a page because you don't like it, you abuse the tools. When you decide to use the tools in a way that you think will help the project, you are fulfilling your role as an admin. Three admins came to three different conclusions on what to do with this article. I'm human and I make mistakes, but even my mistakes are made in good faith. --jonny-mt 14:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy deletion is for uncontroversial deletions. Quoting from WP:SPEEDY, "the criteria for speedy deletion specify the only cases in which administrators have broad consensus support to, at their discretion, bypass deletion discussion and immediately delete Wikipedia pages or media." The removal of the PROD and the comments on the talk pages showed no such broad consensus. Moreover, "speedy deletion is intended to reduce the time spent on deletion discussions for pages or media with no practical chance of surviving discussion." The article certainly does not "have no practical chance of surviving discussion", as shown by the AFD. The abuse lines in the fact that deletion and page protection are both admin-only powers, actions not reversible by non-admins, and thus using those powers in this situation was bypassing process and railroading through a deletion over the objections of ordinary (non-admin) editors. —Lowellian (reply) 16:32, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
please provide me with the images Image:Image-tism1985demotapesidea.jpg and Image:Image-tism1985demotapesideb.jpg
I would like to see the images and upload them to my own TISM wiki (tism.referata.com). FokkerTISM 22:15, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.
You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:30, 30 October 2011 (UTC).
Happy Adminship Anniversary
Plz Make winning studios and Dj bulletproof plz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daman59 (talk • contribs) 10:58, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Howard Moss (musician)
This singer songwriter was deleted because of lack of proof of chart hits?83.147.134.244 (talk) 16:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Please see these areas for evidence:
http://musicbrainz.org/doc/BBC_Landing_Page
Moss is also registered with PPI, PPL and IMRO
kind regards.
An RfC about the use of the {{fairusereview}} tag on mainspace pages is in progress here. From 2005 until recently, this template was added to file pages when the non-free status of the file was being discussed. In May this year it was edited so that it could be added to articles. The RfC question is: "Should the template be reverted to the pre-May 2013 version, and retained only for use on file pages?"
Since you are a registered member of the Fair Use WikiProject, you might have an interest in this discussion.Tom Reedy (talk) 04:48, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Request for translation: List of sources for an article
Dear Jonny-mt,
On the Reference desk someone recommended using the list of translators in response to a request. Are you willing to translate portions of or all of the list of references on this page? es:Wikipedia discusión:Consultas de borrado/Liceo Mexicano Japonés? It is for an AFD on the Spanish Wikipedia. This is so Spanish-speaking editors can understand what Japanese references exist about the subject. You are welcome to translate the references into English.
Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 16:33, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Hawaii edit-a-thon!
Hello. I'm interested in attempting to put together an edit-a-thon for Hawaiian cultural topics something during the Makahiki festival perhaps around the month of November. The hope is that our lackluster coverage of Hawaiian mythology could be improved with help from the Bishop Museum, Hawaii Pacific University, and the Honolulu public library. I am in the process of making initial contacts with these organizations as well as Wikimedia DC's GLAM project. If this sounds like something you might be interested in participating in, or perhaps helping to coordinate, could you please add your name to 2014 Makahiki Edit-a-thon?--v/r - TP 07:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Translation Contributing
Hello Jonny-mt! Would you be interested in a Japanese translation collaboration? The Japanese version of the AIG page looks like it could use some updating. Regards! MsGingerHoneycutt (talk) 19:25, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Electrozombies Deletion
You deleted my entry of Electrozombies, because of Advertisement!? See this list on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_music_magazines In this case you can also delete all this site, right? I didn't do an advertisment. It should just be an informative page. Thank you for under standing.
kind regards, Tom
- There is a difference between promoting something and stating that something (notable) exists. Please read the links provided on your talk page for more information. --jonny-mt 12:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mg planetoid.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mg planetoid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)